Technology

37801 readers

231 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

152

US lawyers will reportedly try to force Google to sell Chrome and unbundle Android (www.theverge.com)

submitted 1 month ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Requirements that officials are preparing to propose include that Google separate Android from Search and Google Play, but without trying to force Google to sell off Android. Another requirement would say it has to share more information with advertisers and that it “give them more control over where their ads appear,” the outlet writes.

Bloomberg also reports that officials will recommend that the company “give websites more options to prevent their content from being used by Google’s artificial intelligence products.” Finally, they will reportedly recommend “a ban on the type of exclusive contracts that were at the center of the case against Google.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

imo if anything the opposite causality is true: this DOJ was banking on a continuation of Biden in Kamala Harris, and because that is no longer forthcoming they're now trying to get something out the door before the administrative changeover in the hopes it can stick. it almost certainly won't, but most of Trump's appointees are gigamad about "censorship" and they hate Google for "punishing conservative voices" or whatever so it's hardly the most contrived hail mary if so

[–] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fair point. With that in mind, my new prediction is that Trump's DOJ will start a new case against Google, and then spend two years tripping over their feet before landing at the exact same point.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 1 month ago

Before losing and getting the case dismissed with prejudice ,preventing another trial during a later administration you mean, surely

[–] hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago

The case likely began (as an investigation) while Trump was still in office. Here's hoping it can continue.