No I have a disability, we went over this. You can point it out like an asshole or you can accept what is obviously an error as an error and stop trying to end zone dance about it.

Your last comment implies you know my political stance, are you admitting you're full of shit and spite not necessarily in that order.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

...wat?

Was "woke" a typo?

You haven't told me about any disability. Unless that's a joke about being stupid? Or do you legitimately have a learning disability?

I only guessed your political stance as conservative based on your use of the word "woke."

I am full of shit and spite though.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's a typo in that it's an inadvertantly added word in didn't catch, sure. And yes on both accounts, are you honestly just trying to win "shitty irrelevant things to make fun of" bingo or something?

Ah and yet your last comment said you know me so we know one thing for a fact, you're a liar for whatever that might be worth.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You accidentally typed the word "woke" and didn't notice?

I wasn't trying to make fun of your disability, to be clear. I just wanted to be mean to you. I'm also disabled.

I legitimately think you must be getting me confused with someone else

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You understand what severe dyslexia is correct?

And yet you are still doing it, funny how that is. Notice me not making fun of your disability.

No.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

You understand what severe dyslexia is correct?

Yeah

And yet you are still doing it

I was asking genuinely. You wrote a whole word that you wouldn't use in that context if you weren't a conservative (even by mistake), and I didn't realize your use of it was an error. I'm not making fun of you for the error. I'm laughing at you for being conservative

No.

Okay, then link me to where you asked me, and link me to where I lied, please

Edit: disregard the "link me to where you asked me" part- responding to that in our other thread

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There's your explanation then.

No you weren't, you clearly don't care or you wouldn't be playing the troll in another comment chain. Also, no I'm not a conservative and anyway it didn't make sense in context so it was clearly an error. Again, you tried to make light of the situation and stuck your foot directly in your mouth.

I already did that, fuckin read dude it would solve a lot of these issues.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Little of what you've said makes much sense, so I had no way to know

Let's make a few things clear:

You started this by attacking me.
I think you're not only simply uneducated (understandable given the severe dyslexia), but also legitimately lacking cognitive abilities expected of persons with an IQ of at least 100.
I don't like you; I have been mean to you on purpose, and I think it's funny to fuck with you because you're such a little bitch about it
This continues to be an entertaining activity for me. You're like a dancing little monkey. If this isn't entertaining for you, you should stop responding.
If you'd like to stop now but feel like a winner, feel free to report this comment- there's a good chance it gets me banned. (Rule 1- be civil and nice)

Also- check timestamps. I edited that comment when your other reply came through, and responded over there.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Not at all.

I said anarchism is dumb, you took it personally which is pretty strange honestly. *160, get at me. I've explained my position, you've made fun of me. What exactly you're deducing my intelligence from is at best a curiosity at worst simply made up. *See I don't dislike you, I'd rather a conversation about how school children laugh at anarchists for the stupidity of their ideals. Similarly, you've been the crybaby bitch here and you're doing it now which is amusing. *Add racism? Like I said, you have to be doing Nazi bingo or something. *I don't get people banned crybaby and you probably wouldn't get banned for it no matter how much that might play to your edge lord proclivities.

*Edit= sounds like crying about an edit to me.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

160

Lol

add racism

Bruh. Like I could know you're a racial minority.

I don't get people banned

Respect, honestly. A few tweaks and you're basically an anarchist already

Edit= sounds like crying about an edit to me.

Hey, you're the one that told me to "fucking read" when you can't read timestamps. Idk what to tell you

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Doubt all you'd like it's not an argument and you didn't know me well enough to think anything more or less. But do go on.

Am I? I tend to refrain from calling people monkeys because of the obvious implied racism.

Not at all, there are better forms of haven't government and given this interaction in 100% proof anarchism doesn't work.

I told you to fucking read because you didn't before the edit dipshit, you can't retroactively act less stupid simply because you edited after the fact. I know what to tell you though, stop crying.