this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024

454 points (99.1% liked)

Open Source

31733 readers

183 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

kevincox@lemmy.ml

CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml

Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml

454

Ventoy source code contains some unknown BLOBs, still no word on the issue from the dev after months (github.com)

submitted 3 months ago by SatyrSack@lemmy.one to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

127 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I had no idea this issue had been identified. While I find this tool very useful, the project is seeming rather questionable to me now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The binaries in question are various GNU and FOSS tools from elsewhere, not part of the Ventoy project itself. So no, the Ventoy author does not own the copyright of the tools in question.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Even then, he's still allowed to provide binary blobs. He doesn't have to provide it as source code. If that was the case, we'd all have to build from source and package managers like apt, dnf and flatpak wouldn't exist.

All he has to do is make the source code available, i.e. just link back to the original Github Repo.