this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
122 points (94.2% liked)

Privacy

31856 readers
233 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Steve@communick.news 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

First, it's not a TickTok ban. It's a ByteDance ban. ByteDance could sell TickTok to another company outside China and TickTock would be fine in the US.

Second, it was never about protecting user data. It was about preventing China from tweaking the algorithm to try to subtly influence public political opinion, instead of maximizing generic rage and political polarization, to exploit for ad dollars.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Yet nobody cares about US companies like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube manipulating public opinion with their algorithms.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Plenty of people care, just not enough

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This isnt the point.

An adverserial nation shouldnt be able to influence public opinion like that.

We all understand that those companies do nefarious things. Imo its quite a bit different when its a whole ass country purposefully manipulating public opinion and they dont like the united states.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

I get it, i don't want to live in China but i don't want to live in whatever Elon Musk has planned for the US, either, and his wealth gives him undue influence over... pretty much everything. You're not convincing me you've got a consistent take here if you're cool with Twitter but not TikTok.

[–] Steve@communick.news 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nobody cares because they are US companies.

[–] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Seems bizarre that people are okay with public opinion being explicitly manipulated by a very small group of people with very little overlapping interest with the public, but not okay with public opinion being explicitly manipulated by a very small group of people with very little overlapping interest with the public from a foreign country.

[–] Steve@communick.news 0 points 2 months ago

Not really. One can be dealt with if needs be, since they're US companies. The other can't because it's the Chinese government.

[–] Anonymouse@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

You're exactly right on both counts. When you hear it from politicians, the sound bite (byte?) is "to protect the children" which is ambiguous. I take it to mean to protect the data of my children, somebody else takes it to mean to protect my children from being brainwashed and the children running the social media companies take it to mean it's protecting their right to wealth. It's win win win!

If the US govn't were serious about protecting people, they'd implement GDPR and put data privacy into the hands of the individual.