this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
659 points (96.9% liked)

Memes

45902 readers
1714 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
659
There's definitely a distinction (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
84 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've seen some people getting genuinely uncomfortable at the recent discourse. Just wanted to point out there's more than one kind of weird.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

no, they absolutely dont. giving them an option of 'good weird' is going to derail that

[–] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think the point is that Republicans detest the idea of being weird no matter what, so they would rage at the suggestion of being a good weird anyway. To them "good weird" is an oxymoron, even though they are actually very weird and not in any kind of good way.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

yeah that makes sense. i was envisioning them attempting to 'own' it by jumping into 'good weird' with both feet.

but as someone else pointed out also, thats prolly giving them too much sefl-aware credit

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

They've been bullying the good weirdos for decades, there's no backtracking now!

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

I get that. I don't think they're capable of that level of self reflection. To them, weird is BAD. It's being a part of the "out" group, which is anathema to them.