188
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A jury previously awarded Shannon Phillips $25.6 million.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Enigma@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago

What does fining corpos have to do with cops? These are 2 separate discussions.

[-] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What does fining corpos have to do with cops? These are 2 separate discussions.

Well, time to see how deep kbin will let me nest quotes.

Race or not, how does a wrongful termination cause $28.3mio in damages?
At the same time, the two men who were arrested for existing and for being black received a whopping $1 each.

A lot of the time these things include fines to teach them a lesson. Otherwise corporations would do this way more.

Which is a useless tactic for cops since it's taxpayers who pay anyhow. Still think settlements should be higher though.

When half your city budget becomes paying for police settlements maybe then police reform will have a wider appeal.

What does fining corpos have to do with cops? These are 2 separate discussions.

Conversations wander.

In this case, someone asked, (paraphrasing) "How does it make sense to get millions for a race related firing and a dollar for race related wrongful arrest" <-- Note here that arrests are generally done by cops.

Then someone else said, (paraphrasing) "Well, they do these big settlements to teach companies a lesson."

Then I said, (paraphrasing) "Would be great if they could do that when cops wreck people's lives, but then it would only be taxpayers footing the bill anyhow."

Then you said, (paraphrasing) "Why are you changing the topic?"

Then I summarized, just now, to explain how I'm doing no such thing.

I realize I just restated what was already there, but -- it was already there when you asked, so....

[-] Enigma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

What a long winded non answer.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe -3 points 10 months ago

It answered it fine, and was on topic with an easy to follow chain of thought.

[-] Enigma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

It did not answer my question. What does cops have to do in regards to the topic at hand, which is about dining corpos. Rewording the comment chain does not answer that question.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe -4 points 10 months ago

It was directly compared to the "damages" given to two black men being racially discriminated against.

[-] Enigma@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Where? Unless I missed a comment, the OC was about taxpayers paying for cops settlements in general when the topic at hand was about how corporations are fined. And I say again, those are 2 separate discussions.

[-] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 10 months ago

Dude fell for a strawman and just wont admit they're wrong.

[-] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

@Enigma

I literally quoted every comment showing how the comparison was drawn, then paraphrased them. All those comments are still here, right now.

And despite calling my comment longwinded, you apparently didn't actually read or comprehend any of it?

Would you like me to edit it to add links to each of those comments in progression?

[-] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 10 months ago

It's not on topic. It's a strawman.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de -1 points 10 months ago

I think your comment was on topic.

[-] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 10 months ago

It really wasn't on topic. It's a strawman argument.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
188 points (98.0% liked)

News

21706 readers
3801 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS