this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
533 points (98.9% liked)

News

22838 readers
3699 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] p3n@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I'll probably get down-voted to oblivion for asking, but continuing this train of thought: If a woman gives birth to a baby and simply walks away, should she be charged with a crime?

If not, why?

If so, why?

There are plenty of examples of this, so it really isn't thoeretical.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's easy to bring a baby to a facility and say "I can't do this." There is no punishment for doing so.

It's much more difficult to leave a fetus at a facility and say "I can't do this."

It is also very difficult to get a 3rd trimester abortion unless there are some major health risks involved. During the 1st trimester (when 95% of abortions are performed) the fetus is physically incapable of feeling pain.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

Yes, because it's trivial to simply leave the baby at a fire station. The important distinction is that it's drastically easier to carry a baby for 10 blocks than 10 months.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes because you have an active duty to seek continuation of care when leaving someone helpless. It’s like walking away after trying to help an unconscious stranger when you learn they need cpr. You don’t necessarily need to give them cpr but you should have to at least call 911 for them

[–] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago

She is not and should not get in any trouble. If anything the decision should be celebrated, as long as we’re talking about a safe dropoff at a hospital or other safe haven.

The child will go from a mother who was in a situation so bad she was willing to give up her baby, to most likely a couple that’s been waiting years to adopt and are dying to be parents.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, because that baby is helpless and is her responsibility to take care of. It's also an actual person, not a potential person like a fetus is.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No. A mother/parent/or guardian can abandon a newborn at most hospitals, fire stations, or safe haven deep off stations. In most cases the process is anonymous if you want it to be.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/parenting/2019/09/13/safe-haven-laws-things-you-didnt-know-surrendering-newborn/2031516001/

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Moving the goalposts. That is not "simply walking away." That's following an established process in place.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Following the established process for what?

Is it for "walking away from parental responsibility?"

[–] notjustlurking@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What if she was impregnated against her will? What if she was forced to birth the child against her will? Is it still her responsibility?

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is her responsibility to make sure the baby isn't just being left to die somewhere, yes. If she wants to take it somewhere where others will take care of it, so be it. But it is NEVER right to "simply walk away."

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, there's no excuse for dumpster babies when it is so easy to leave them with responsible people who will ensure the child grows up safe, in a loving home.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

While it's not easy to find safe, loving homes, at least give the kid a chance at life rather than dooming it to a horrible death.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"What is a woman was raped, then locked up for 9 months until she gave birth, then let free. Would she be at fault if she abandoned the baby?"

  1. Considering the severe mental trauma involved here: No, I don't think she would be.
  2. What the fuck is wrong with you?
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, she would be if she left it on the street or in a dumpster or something. If she doesn't want it, she should surrender it to someone or someplace that will take care of it What the fuck is wrong with YOU that you think it's acceptable for a baby to be left to die?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

She's been locked in a room and tormented for 9 months. I'm not saying it's "acceptable", I'm saying it's understandable if the first thing she does is run away from the symbol of her torment. Much like how murder isn't acceptable, but if the first thing she did was murder the person who tortured her there wouldn't be a jury that would convict her. There is a strong case for temporary insanity.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can't see down votes (blahaj user), but I hope you weren't downvoted to oblivion. It's good to ask questions that examine one's beliefs and those of others. It's a great way to grow as a person. I personally believe the more difficult and awkward the question, the more it should be considered.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just click on the little rainbow star and you'll see the score from their instance.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

I had no idea! I use Voyager for mobile and it doesn't show the little star, but I see what you're talking about on desktop. Thanks!