this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
626 points (69.4% liked)

Memes

44217 readers
2128 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someacnt_@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

But how do we produce enough batteries for renewable energy?

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Pumped hydro? Or one of the many other non battery storage options, or just over production

[–] someacnt_@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How viable is pumped hydro? It would be good if feasible, but last I checked, there were not enough places where you can install them.

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, you're right. It's not an option for everyone. Which is why I mentioned that there are many other solutions which are similar and over production which is simpler and cheaper

[–] someacnt_@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which options, can you specify?

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What? You don't have Google? Options I know of (other than batteries and pumped hydro) : Compressed Air Energy Storage, Thermal Energy Storage,, Fly wheels, Hydrogen, Supercapacitors, Gravitational Storage

[–] someacnt_@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
  1. It's not easy to go over all options.
  2. Many of these are largely theoretical, or for temporary storage. For instance, I don't think fluwheels can store energy for months.
[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you proposing that the sun may not shine and the wind not blow anywhere at all for months?

[–] someacnt_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, it is like that in some places. Also solar flux vary a lot by seasons as well. Dunno if wind has as much of an issue, but surely not great.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone -1 points 2 weeks ago

Nobody wants energy stored for months. Whatever storage is used needs to get through temporary decreases in efficiency. In places that use solar, that means from one afternoon to the next morning. In places that use wind, it means until the wind picks up. We're talking storage on the order of tens of hours at the most.

[–] fellowmortal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The fact that you descend into complete science fiction should give you pause for thought. I doubt it will, but please think about how fantastical your proposed solutions are - "a massive lake of molten salt under every city" (I actually like that one!)...

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Given you're making up things I never said I can only imagine what you're respinding to? Where did a massive lake of molten salt under every city come from?

[–] fellowmortal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sorry this is a late reply. I can see that mentioning molten salt was a bit left-field, However, it is one of the more realistic ways to store the huge amounts of power needed to fuel an economy for a couple of weeks (which you need in northern europe if you want to use solar/wind). Here's a link about it:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cite.202000137

I am pro nuclear, but if we are going to descend into this renewable hell, then we need to actually think about how you store terawatt-hours of power. I really think that this kind of storage might be the nearest we have to a solution. we'll only need it once we try to turn off the gas turbines, of course. It is fascinating that so many smart people don't see that the whole jigsaw is missing vital pieces.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pumped hydro requires a specific sort of place and not sure there's enough of them for most countries to rely on.

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Correct. That's why I enumerate a bunch itf other options for the other guy who said the same thing.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Redox flow, sodium ion, iron air, etc.

There are some 600+ current chemical-based battery technologies out there.

Hell for me, once sodium is cracked, that shit is so abundant that production wouldn't have many bottlenecks to get started.

[–] someacnt_@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Will Li-ion battery companies let that happen? They want profit, which means they want to keep the high battery cost.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oil & Gas companies didn't want Solar, Wind, and Storage to proliferate, yet they did because of cost savings.

I think we could start to see that for these alternative-ion batteries if lithium supply ever becomes an issue. There will always be a niche that has the opportunity to grow in the economy. Just takes the right circumstances and preparation

[–] someacnt_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

True, but gotta see. Currently these companies are so minor.

[–] imgcat@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Price driven consumption has been done by industrial users for decades. And countries like UK has been storing energy in storage heaters at home for decades as well. EVs can do wonders here.