922
submitted 5 days ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

The most common argument used in defense of mass surveillance is ‘If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear’. Try saying that to women in the US states where abortion has suddenly become illegal. Say it to investigative journalists in authoritarian countries. Saying ‘I have nothing to hide’ means you stop caring about anyone fighting for their freedom. And one day, you might be one of them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] onlooker@lemmy.ml 49 points 4 days ago

I tried arguing against this, but it's no use. I tried pointing out how something can be branded illegal retroactively, like 20 years down the line, I tried the "give me your credit card info" approach, nothing took. 90% of the time the counter-argument is usually something to the effect of "big companies know everything about me anyway", which is just guessing on their part.

I'm just going to take care of my own privacy, because I'm clearly in the minority (present company excluded, of course). Almost everyone I know disregards online privacy completely, so I'm done trying to get a dialogue going with these people; it's every man for himself. The only way online privacy will become a hot topic among laymen is when something nasty happens and at that point, it will have been too late.

[-] Subverb@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

As Doctorow points out, 'Saying security and privacy don't matter because you have nothing to hide is like saying freedom of speech doesn't mater because you have nothing to say.'

It's a very short-sighted view. Those rights will be taken from you if you don't protect them.

[-] Landslide7648@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 days ago

That doesn’t work for the “the big companies know everything about me anyway” line though

[-] Gigasser@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

They may know everything about you right now. But they don't know about your future self, how you can change, how you may be an entirely different person in as little as a year. Data is useful, but it is more useful the more updated and recent it is.

[-] Subverb@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Well I think it does, because they don't know literally everything about us yet. But they will one day if we don't fight back.

[-] Landslide7648@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago

You’re missing the point. It doesn’t matter what you or I believe, if a person has accepted that a big corporation knows everything about them and use this as a reason not to take action or prevent them from knowing more, then the Doctorow quote doesn’t apply.

my personal response is ALWAYS "would you be fine living with a state mandated police officer, FBI agent, CIA agent, whatever, in your house 24/7 making sure you never did anything wrong?"

the answer is no, because obviously it's no.

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

a fren that will report all your wrong doings to big government!

[-] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 days ago

Just tell them unlock their phone so you can take a look of his browser history. Works quite a few time for me.

[-] onlooker@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago

At one time I did, and to my surprise, my friend did just that! Unlocked their phone and handed it to me without a word. Welp.

[-] nomous@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

So you logged into all their social media and changed their passwords and recovery emails right? I don't just want access now, I want it in perpetuity.

[-] Name@feddit.nu 4 points 3 days ago

"I don't trust you!" But they trust whatever NSA-agent looking at their private photos not to save anything for later..

[-] xilona@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes, family, friends trust more an outsider rather than a family member with decades of real proven knowledge in the IT/Tech field.

The reason being that AUTHORITIES have imense power of manipulation at hand rather than a single opinion of a family member...

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"I don't have anything to hide because I think I've done something wrong: I have something to hide because I question your judgement and motives."

They're fine giving you their info because they trust you. The problem is when the person seeking that information is untrustworthy -- and some shithead(s) making their way into a company or government isn't just possible, it's likely.

Tell them to give all their sensitive personal information to someone that hates them. Credit card numbers, political beliefs, nudes, sexual preferences/fetishes, etc.

[-] xilona@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 days ago

Thank you very much for speaking my mind!

I would also add that the "Plandemic" WAS that nasty thing that started other nasty things happening AND still few acknowledge what you are very well talking about.

IT is not only about being able to exercise the freedom of speech, privacy or living and loving, IT IS about HUMANS and HUMANITY and those that are against it...

REAL EYES, REALISE, REAL LIES! ☝️

[-] Belastend@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

"plandemic" opinion discarded

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
922 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

29763 readers
1036 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS