95
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 week ago

The organisers should just cut their power supply. Or disqualify the team for trying to gain an unfair advantage.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

How is it unfair? Couldn't any team do the same thing?

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago

ACs are not being provided to reduce emissions. Most teams seem to be respecting this decision.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No, it's just posturing. The emissions from AC at the Olympic Village would have zero impact on climate change. This is just green washing for public perception points.

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago

The emissions saved from removing a few hundred ACs are negligible. But the message it sends to the millions watching the Olympics is significant. Which, again, is why I am hoping there will be at least some symbolic action against rule-breakers - it will start a conversation about the need to regulate / ban ACs.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

As far as I can tell, there is no rule to break here.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
95 points (97.0% liked)

World News

31446 readers
1157 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS