this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
95 points (97.0% liked)

World News

32136 readers
1182 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How is it unfair? Couldn't any team do the same thing?

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

ACs are not being provided to reduce emissions. Most teams seem to be respecting this decision.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, it's just posturing. The emissions from AC at the Olympic Village would have zero impact on climate change. This is just green washing for public perception points.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The emissions saved from removing a few hundred ACs are negligible. But the message it sends to the millions watching the Olympics is significant. Which, again, is why I am hoping there will be at least some symbolic action against rule-breakers - it will start a conversation about the need to regulate / ban ACs.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

As far as I can tell, there is no rule to break here.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lol that's bullshit, someone fucked up to save a dime and they're trying spin it

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

First of all, [citation needed]. Second, even if it is, a good message is being sent.