52
submitted 1 week ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago

Batteries too seem to be growing exponentially, perhaps even more so than solar. See the cleantech report from RMI, page 14 (PDF).

I suspect the people that still claim that renewables + storage alone can't work are going to look pretty silly in 10 years time (although they'll likely find a way to move the goalposts yet again by that point).

[-] mormund@feddit.de 6 points 1 week ago

I'm confident solar + batteries will solve short term storage. But as far as I know energy density is just not there for seasonal storage. However when energy becomes dirt cheap, chemical storage through Hydrogen or downstream products should become an economic no brainer as well

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago

Seasonal storage is mostly not needed. Close to the equator it is not due to not really having a season problem. Further to the poles you have stronger winds in winter.

[-] mormund@feddit.de 1 points 1 week ago

That could be the case. But with solar prices consistently dropping every year it should dominate even more in the future. I'm not so sure wind will keep up

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

So does wind, just not as fast as solar.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, there's a bunch of modeling that shows that fairly small amounts of storage enable 90% or more decarbonization at temperate and tropical latitudes.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
52 points (98.1% liked)

Green Energy

1945 readers
225 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS