289

As soon as Apple announced its plans to inject generative AI into the iPhone, it was as good as official: The technology is now all but unavoidable. Large language models will soon lurk on most of the world’s smartphones, generating images and text in messaging and email apps. AI has already colonized web search, appearing in Google and Bing. OpenAI, the $80 billion start-up that has partnered with Apple and Microsoft, feels ubiquitous; the auto-generated products of its ChatGPTs and DALL-Es are everywhere. And for a growing number of consumers, that’s a problem.

Rarely has a technology risen—or been forced—into prominence amid such controversy and consumer anxiety. Certainly, some Americans are excited about AI, though a majority said in a recent survey, for instance, that they are concerned AI will increase unemployment; in another, three out of four said they believe it will be abused to interfere with the upcoming presidential election. And many AI products have failed to impress. The launch of Google’s “AI Overview” was a disaster; the search giant’s new bot cheerfully told users to add glue to pizza and that potentially poisonous mushrooms were safe to eat. Meanwhile, OpenAI has been mired in scandal, incensing former employees with a controversial nondisclosure agreement and allegedly ripping off one of the world’s most famous actors for a voice-assistant product. Thus far, much of the resistance to the spread of AI has come from watchdog groups, concerned citizens, and creators worried about their livelihood. Now a consumer backlash to the technology has begun to unfold as well—so much so that a market has sprung up to capitalize on it.


Obligatory "fuck 99.9999% of all AI use-cases, the people who make them, and the techbros that push them."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 22 points 3 weeks ago

Good thing about this is it’s self selecting, all the luddites who refuse to use AI will find themselves at a disadvantage just the same as refusing to use a computer isn’t doing anyone any favours.

[-] MayonnaiseArch@beehaw.org 36 points 2 weeks ago

Luddites were not idiots, they were people who understood the only use of tech at their time was to fuck them. Like this complete garbage shit is going to be used to fuck people. Nobody is opposed to having tools, we just don't like Musk fanboys blowing spit bubbles while trying to get peepee hard

[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 12 points 2 weeks ago

If capitalism is shit you attack capitalism not a technology.

All the misplaced rage and wasted effort.

[-] rysiek@mstdn.social 16 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That literally tells the story of a people’s losing their livelihood due to capitalist usage of technology, and targeting the technology instead of the systemic issue.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 weeks ago

You say this like destroying the technology wasn't their way of targeting the systemic issue? Destroying expensive machinery has been used by labour time and again as a tactic to get the capitalist class to cough up.

[-] MayonnaiseArch@beehaw.org 5 points 2 weeks ago
[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

Capitalists have an answer to this, it's called the Pinkertons...

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

So, do textiles machines not exist anymore? It doesnt sound like them burning down factories stopped the textile factories in the long run

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
289 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37208 readers
619 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS