this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
71 points (90.8% liked)

Games

31324 readers
993 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I've never played a Dragon Age, and I don't want to put words in fans' mouths, but does this game look good to you?

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One day the series was a dark fantasy with a more tactical combat with a mix of turn based combat.

Now this shit is a High Fantasy with Kingdom of Amalur combat.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Kingdoms of Amalur was exactly what I thought of. And I liked that game. But this didn't look like those old games.

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The thing is Kingomds of Amalur is a 2012 game, 12 years later we have a AAA with same combat? Doesn't looks like a evolution at all.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean "same combat", like Amalur made some novel innovation? They're both just 3D, third-person action combat; it's a mechanic. This is like knocking Fallout New Vegas because it still had you shooting guns, and we already shot guns in Fallout 3.

The game looks disappointing for plenty of legitimate reasons, so let's stick to those.

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think you misunderstood me, Amalur has a bland combat without much depth and that what I'm comparing to. The new combat looks like a generic third-person combat, they got rid of the tactical combat and didn't offer anything substantial.

The boss fight with the pride demon looks okay, but the normal enemies are like smashing the button 3 times to kill them.

[–] Jyrdano@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The opinions are all over the place right now. As someone who loved DA2, I have no problem with actiony combat and linear world, as long as the storytelling and companions stay the same quality.

[–] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I think people forgot how much flack DA2 got over not being a Tactical game like DA:O.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've played only Origins but this trailer is not doing a whole lot for me. Even visually I don't like it (which is bizarre because I think Origins looks like shit and still I somehow prefer it). Don't really like this art direction, personally.

[–] TheCannonball@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

If you've only played the most tactical of all of the Dragon Age games and not the Action based variations that are literally the other 2 games, please stop talking

[–] Nima@leminal.space 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

looks great. the combat reminds me of dragon age 2. I'm quite excited!

[–] TheCannonball@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Thank you! People forget that this hasn't been a tactical series since the first game. It's like people complaining that Zelda BOTW wasn't a top down 2D puzzler.

[–] TheCannonball@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Don't listen to the whiners. There are 3 games in the Dragon Age series and only one of them can be considered a "Tactical" game. Hell, I remember all of the fallout and whining from fans when Dragon Age 2 became more of an arcade hack and slash. And then Inquisition was just a combo of the two styles that leaned towards Action over Tactics.