this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
245 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

33640 readers
217 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It seems like a profit-driven thing to me. Big piles of anonymized data are worth a pretty penny.

[–] ID411@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Mozilla famous non-profit status notwithstanding of course

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Mozilla Foundation has a wholly owned subsidiary that is Mozilla Corporation that is for-profit.

For instance the revenue from Google, so they’re the default search engine, is seen by Mozilla Corporation. So things search-related will indeed be part of their for-profit arm.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago

It's technically for profit, but it has a single shareholder: the Foundation. There are no greedy shareholders that can get rich off of that profit.

Of course, employees/board members can be richly compensated, but that's independent of for-/non-profit status.

[–] ID411@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’d like to read more on that if you have anything. Seems like too big a loophole ?

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

It’s not a loophole. As a subsidiary, profits are still invested into the nonprofit and they’re still guided by the Mozilla manifesto. It just lets them do more and raise more funds which would be difficult to do with nonprofit status (selling default search engine for instance). Here’s their original press release when they incorporated Mozilla Corporation in 2005.

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A non-profit can, in fact, profit, but it has specific rules on what it can do with those profits. Tax law is a rabbit hole and I don't even wanna peer in

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Used to work for a non-profit retirement community in a pretty small area; the guy running the joint lived in a $3M "house" with a full 7 car garage.

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Enshitification hits every company, even Mozilla.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately Mozilla is being run by a McKinsey consultant.