this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
222 points (95.9% liked)

Linux

48062 readers
711 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gaael@lemmy.world 69 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The article talks about sudo and doas being SUID binaries and having a larger attack surface than run0 would. Could someone ELI5 what this means?

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 215 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Basically, the SUID bit makes a program get the permissions of the owner when executed. If you set /bin/bash as SUID, suddenly every bash shell would be a root shell, kind of. Processes on Linux have a real user ID, an effective user ID, and also a saved user ID that can be used to temporarily drop privileges and gain them back again later.

So tools like sudo and doas use this mechanism to temporarily become root, then run checks to make sure you're allowed to use sudo, then run your command. But that process is still in your user's session and process group, and you're still its real user ID. If anything goes wrong between sudo being root and checking permissions, that can lead to a root shell when you weren't supposed to, and you have a root exploit. Sudo is entirely responsible for cleaning the environment before launching the child process so that it's safe.

Run0/systemd-run acts more like an API client. The client, running as your user, asks systemd to create a process and give you its inputs and outputs, which then creates it on your behalf on a clean process tree completely separate from your user session's process tree and group. The client never ever gets permissions, never has to check for the permissions, it's systemd that does over D-Bus through PolKit which are both isolated and unprivileged services. So there's no dangerous code running anywhere to exploit to gain privileges. And it makes run0 very non-special and boring in the process, it really does practically nothing. Want to make your own in Python? You can, safely and quite easily. Any app can easily integrate sudo functionnality fairly safely, and it'll even trigger the DE's elevated permission prompt, which is a separate process so you can grant sudo access to an app without it being able to know about your password.

Run0 takes care of interpreting what you want to do, D-Bus passes the message around, PolKit adds its stamp of approval to it, systemd takes care of spawning of the process and only the spawning of the process. Every bit does its job in isolation from the others so it's hard to exploit.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] Drusenija@lemmy.world 104 points 6 months ago (2 children)

(I'll attempt this based on my understanding of both)

Pouring a cup of juice is something an adult needs to be involved with.

sudo is when you ask for permission to pour your own cup of juice. You ask an adult, they give you the cup and the juice, and then you're responsible for pouring it. If the adult isn't paying attention they may leave the fridge open for you to go back for more juice or another beverage, but otherwise you're limited to the amount of juice the adult has given you.

run0 is when the adult just gets you a cup of juice. You tell them what you want, they go and pour the juice, and just give you the cup with the juice in it. You never enter the kitchen, so you don't have access to the fridge, just your cup of juice.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago

This is an extremely good explanation.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 19 points 6 months ago

Gagagoogoo Gagaga

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 months ago

when in need, cry out for mommy!

[–] Drusenija@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

caseyweederman is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 34 points 6 months ago

Some executables are special. When you run them, they automagically run as root instead! But if sudo isn't very, very careful, you can trick it into letting you run things as root that you shouldn't be able to.

Run0 DM's systemd asking it to go fork a process as root for you, and serves as the middleman between you and the other process.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

You had me rolling, bud.

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 34 points 6 months ago

Dude, you need a prize for this comment. Very well explained!

[–] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Sounds good in theory.

But I've had so many issues with D-Bus fucking shit up on my systems that I'd be very reluctant to hinge my only way of recovering from failures upon something so brittle.

Granted, D-Bus hasn't given me any trouble since moving to NixOS. The hell of trying to recover my arch systems from a perpetually failing D-Bus would make me very apprehensive to adopt this. I could see myself using run0 by default, but keeping sudo-rs or doas around with a much stricter configuration as a failsafe until the run0 + D-Bus + PolKit is absolutely stable and bulletproof.

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 9 points 6 months ago

I haven't had D-Bus problems in quite a while but actually run0 should help with some of those issues. Like, systemctl --user will actually work when used with run0, or at least systemd-run can.

Haven't used it yet so it's all theoretical, but it makes sense to me especially at work. I've used systemd-run to run processes in very precise contexts, it's worth using even if just to smush together schedtool, numactl, nice, taskset and sudo in one command and one syntax. Anything a systemd unit can do, systemd-run and run0 can do as well.

I'm definitely going to keep su around just in case because I will break it the same I've broken sudo a few times, but I might give it a shot and see if it's any good just for funsies.

Just trying to explain what it does and what it can do as accurately as possible, because out of context "systemd adds sudo clone" people immediately jump to conclusions. It might not be the best idea in the end but it's also worth exploring.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

At that point just set a break-glass root password and don’t use sudo or doas.

[–] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 months ago

Thank you, i didnt really understand what this was about ubtil now

[–] gaael@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Thanks a lot for this detailed, understandable and kind answer :)

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] chameleon@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago

Some people are opposed to sudo being a fairly complex program with an awkward to understand configuration language and a couple of methods that can fetch config from elsewhere. Fixing upstream sudo can't happen because those features exist and are presumably used by some subset of people, so straight up removing them is not good, but luckily doas and sudo-rs exist as alternatives with a somewhat stripped featureset and less footguns.

Others are opposed to the concept of SUID. Underneath all the SUID stuff lies far more complexity than is obvious at first sight. There's a pretty decent chunk of code in glibc's libdl that will treat all kinds of environment variables differently based on whether an executable is SUID, and when that goes wrong, it's reported as a glibc bug (last year's glibc CVE-2023-4911 was this). And that gets all the more weird when fancy Linux features like namespaces get involved.

Removing SUID requires an entirely different implementation and the service manager is the logical place for that. That's not just Lennart's idea; s6, as minimal and straight to the point as it tends to be, also implements s6-sudo{,d,c}. It's a bit more awkward to use but is a perfectly "Unix philosophy" style implementation of this very same idea.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago

Or just use doas, it's still more secure than sudo

[–] t0m5k1@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Never had an issue. Might look for a replacement should an issue arise. Been driving Linux since sarge.

[–] Para_lyzed@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

SUID stands for Set User ID. An SUID binary is a file that is always run with the UID of the owner user (almost always root). Note that this does not require that the user running them has root permissions, the UID is always changed. For instance, the ping command needs to set up network sockets, which requires root permissions, but is also often used by non-root users to check their network connections. Instead of having to sudo ping, any normal user is able to just run ping, as it uses SUID to run as the root user. sudo and doas also require functions that necessitate them running as root, and so if you can find out how to exploit these commands to run some arbitrary code without having to authenticate (since authentication happens after the binary has started running), there is a potential for vulnerabilities. Specifically, there is the privilege escalation, which is one of the most severe types of vulnerabilities.

run0 starts using systemd-run, which does not use SUID. Instead, it runs with the permissions of the current user, and then authenticates to the root user after the binary has already started to run. systemd-run contacts polkit for authentication, and if it succeeds, it creates a root PTY (pseudo-terminal/virtual terminal), and sends information between your session and the root PTY. So this means that in order to achieve privilege escalation with run0 as root, you have to actually authenticate first, removing the "before authentication" attack surface of sudo and doas.

TL;DR SUID binaries will always run as the owner (usually root), even before any form of authentication. run0 will start with the permissions of the current user, and then authenticate before running anything with root permissions.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Suid is a bit set on executables that results in them being run as the user that owns the file without needing a password, for example, passwd as root.

Run0 ignores this bit

[–] flux@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What a nice succinct explanation!

But also completely useless. Run0 ignores the suid bit for the same reason as 99% of command line apps do: it ignores because it isn't relevant to its functionality.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah not sure what the big deal is honestly