BaalInvoker

joined 1 year ago
[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 4 days ago

Well, it is. Is so stable that many of Arch users install Arch once and don't have to format the computer again in years.

Of course you can't say that Arch is as stable as Debian, cause it's not. But it's totally unfair compare these distros, cause the use cases are completely different.

Don't use a ruler to measure how loud a sound is.

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I called it "stable enough". For a home user, it's stable enough. It's a myth that Arch will break every update or it is unstable. Arch is as unstable or stable as you make it be.

You also can't setup automatic updates safely

That's partially true. If you're trying to run a server, yeah, don't set any automatic update. If you're home user, you may do it and you'll be fine, but be aware of your system.

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Arch is easy to maintain and is stable enough. Of course you can make Arch unstable if you do greedy stuff, but if you use like a normal person, it will be fine

It's using Arch for 5 years now and I never broke my system, for example

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 6 days ago

I don't know if I correctly understood but I think that KDE plasma has this functions you need from DisplayFusion. You need to use Virtual Desktops + Activities, both inhetit to KDE

Maybe I didnt undertand correctly, but I think this may do the job for you

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why are you using that?

    location ~ /\.ht {
        deny all;
    }

You're denying the access to your root, which is the public/ folder and has the file .htaccess that has

<IfModule mod_rewrite.c>
    <IfModule mod_negotiation.c>
        Options -MultiViews -Indexes
    </IfModule>

    RewriteEngine On

    # Handle Authorization Header
    RewriteCond %{HTTP:Authorization} .
    RewriteRule .* - [E=HTTP_AUTHORIZATION:%{HTTP:Authorization}]

    # Redirect Trailing Slashes If Not A Folder...
    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} (.+)/$
    RewriteRule ^ %1 [L,R=301]

    # Send Requests To Front Controller...
    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
    RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
    RewriteRule ^ index.php [L]
</IfModule>

This file handles the income requests and send to the front controller.

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I'm not sure, but looks like you're denying all .htaccess files. Laravel depends on .htaccess to make things work properly

Take a look on Laravel docs - Deployment to make sure your configs are right

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 19 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

We're approaching a new pandemic... Are we prepared?

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 37 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And it's not. SELinux is much more secure, however much more complex. Although AppArmor also do the job, despite being easier to workaround it. But I don't think this is a good argument against Debian.

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I like Tesseract the most! It's exactly a balance between Alexandrite and Photon

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 3 weeks ago

Israel is so nice... Let's give em mushrooms as presents!

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.eco.br/post/6013803

(vou postar em inglês porque vou fazer crosspost, mas no @Linux Brasil pode responder em português)

After recently Firefox update I noticed that audios are cluncky. I mean, if my Firefox isn't playing any sound, if I start a video or any sound start playing (whatsapp notification, for example) it doesn't work at first. For example in videos, I have to pause and unpause the video to the audio start playing properly.

Is anyone experiencing something similar?

Is there anything I can do to solve this issue?

I tried another browsers and another sounds in OS and it doesn't happen, what makes me think it's not an OS bug, but a Firefox bug.

5
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

Summary

I have a old laptop that's serving me as a Technitium DNS server and Tailscale exit node.

My setup is behind a CGNAT, but the Tailscale make its way around and that's not an issue. My VPN exit node works flawlessly.

However I also set my router to make my laptop as DNS server, so all my lan network is passing through the Technitium. So, in theory all my local network is using my selfhosted DNS server.

Issue

The issue here is not the server itself, cause it's working as intended - when I can connect to it.

What's going on is that my server for once in a while become unreachable from lan. If I try to ping it from another device in local network, it returns that it's unreachable, but my server still connected to the internet (I can ping Google, for example). So to solve it, I must do one of the below:

  • Kick the server from the router, forcing it to reconnect
  • Connect to the Tailscale VPN and ping it from the Tailscale ip
  • Reboot my server

It anoys me because it's not supposed to the server become unreachable in local randomly!

It's important to comment that the server isn't connected through ethernet, but it uses wifi because I can't put my laptop near the router. The laptop is close enough to not have any wifi interference, however.

What can I do to prevent my server to become unreachable?

My setup

Server

  • An old Acer laptop connected to the wifi
  • Static IP configured
  • SO: Arch Linux (as server, no GUI at all)

Router

D-Link DIR-842


Thank you in advance

23
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

Prologue

Today I messed up with the permissions at my home folder, so after a struggle time I finally was able to enter in TTY2 and set all my home folder with permissions 766. However I don't know if all my files, folders and hidden stuff had this permission, but still, now my desktop is mostly working.

Actual issue

Now, with mostly correct permissions, I found that my Google Account synced wasn't retrieving any data, so I removed my account from Gnome Online Accounts and tried to login again.

Well, it does not work as intended anymore. The popup shows asking for the username and after asking for the password. After I enter the password, it keeps loading forever never asking me for allow granting Gnome permissions. Interestingly, if I type the password wrong, it recognizes that's wrong and gives me a error message. This bug only happens when I type the correct username and password.

Even more interesting, is that if I try to connect any other Google account, it does work!

What I tried

  • Reboot my laptop
  • Remove the folders ~/.config/goa-1.0, ~/.cache/gnome-control-center-goa-helper and ~/.local/share/gnome-control-center-goa-helper
  • Restore the correct permissions to ~/.gnupg to 600
  • Creating a new user (I wasn't able to login as well)
  • Deleting app permission for Gnome on Google Manage Account
  • Tried to pacman -S gnutls, pacman -S gnome-online-accounts and pacman -S gvfs-goa

I'm hopeless. I don't know what else to try. I need this account connected to my Gnome Online Accounts cause it makes part of my workflow.

Is there any other configuration file I missed? Is there any other database I missed? Any ideia how to solve it?

Thank you in advance, guys


My setup

Hardware Information:

  • Modelo do hardware: Acer Aspire A515-45
  • Memória: 12,0 GiB
  • Processador: AMD Ryzen™ 7 5700U with Radeon™ Graphics × 16
  • Gráficos: AMD Radeon™ Graphics
  • Capacidade de disco: 256,1 GB

Software Information:

  • Versão do firmware: V1.13
  • Nome do SO: Arch Linux
  • Compilação do SO: rolling
  • Tipo do SO: 64 bits
  • Versão do GNOME: 45.0
  • Sistema de janelas: Wayland
  • Verificação do kernel: Linux 6.1.59-1-lts

Solution

Turns out that Google's new 2FA method was not allowing me to proceed with verification. I turned off 2FA, login in the Gnome Accounts and then turn back on the 2FA

 

Bolsonaro did planned a coup in Brazil's election last year.

According to this article a high patent navy soldier agreed with the coup, however the army soldier at the meeting not only refused but also threatened to arrest Bolsonaro.

But this is not everything. The army soldier just made this decision because Biden's government reinforced many times that USA does not support any coup in Brazil. If USA did not refused to support any coup, Brazil would be sent to a completely institutional chaos and a extreme right wing dictatorship and fascism.

The extreme-right is a cancer growing all around the world. It must be stopped.

 

Context: this is my first printer and those are my first filament set

view more: next ›