this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
294 points (85.2% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danhab99@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why was appointing Eich as CEO so controversial? It's because he donated $1,000 in support of California's Proposition 8 in 2008, which was a proposed amendment to California's state constitution to ban same-sex marriage.

Besides this I cannot find another good reason not to use brave. Nobody point to a specific line of code that ruins privacy, not enough reasons.

[–] NeonWoofGenesis@l.henlo.fi 1 points 1 year ago

They used to change the url which the user typed into the address bar to include a referral code. The article mentions going to binance.us, the browser appended a referral link to the url.

That's scummy as fuck.

[–] heird@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you've read all the way up to that line and closed the article didn't you ?

[–] danhab99@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There were 3 points:

  1. CEO is a dick: not enough of a reason

  2. Swapping ads: I have ads disabled anyways so what do I care. If I did care I wouldn't block ads in the first place

3.1. Promoting/friendships with crypto: ¯_(ツ)_/¯

3.2. Privacy leak: it happens ¯_(ツ)_/¯

3.3. Partnering with weird people: ¯_(ツ)_/¯

3.4. IS AN ADVERTISING PLATFORM: ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Good enough for this gay Californian.

[–] danhab99@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] charonn0@startrek.website -1 points 1 year ago

I don't know what you're saying, but I infer it's not meant kindly.

[–] Fish@midwest.social -1 points 1 year ago

Because Firefox is better.

I don't care what the CEO of a corporation is doing because most of them are conservative pieces of shit.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

They block the website's own ads, but inject their own instead. So the user still gets ads, but the profits go to Brave. I know that if the site's owner is aware of that and goes through the process of registering with Brave they get a share of the profits, but this should really be opt-in. As it is, the whole scheme is shady as fuck.