this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
78 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30533 readers
55 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oopsallnaps@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Considering the stories of the code base being an absolute mess, I can see how there might be a floor in what they can charge due to the labour cost of making it functional on PS4 and Switch. Even if the port is the barest of bones, or even a hot mess.

At least it will make it easier to emulate on Linux 😄

[–] NecessaryWeevil@feddit.nl 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

No one is saying that it should be free. The issue is that $50 for a straight port of a 13 year-old game is ridiculous when Sony’s competitor offers free backwards compatibility—and 4K upscaling. Microsoft absorbed their expenses for that as the cost of doing business, and it would be a blip on Rockstar’s balance sheet as well, since they make a perpetual avalanche of money from GTA Online. There’s really no credible justification for a price this high.

[–] all-knight-party@kbin.cafe 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not super worried about it. If it doesn't push the numbers they like, they'll put it on sale just like the GTA Definitive Edition on switch goes on sale semi-regularly. If you don't like the price, don't buy it. When it hits a price you deem acceptable, then go for it

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Microsoft only did that because their first party output over the last decade was embarrassingly bad.

[–] oopsallnaps@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, total agreement there. the price is hot garbo. But figured theres some marketing bs covering the real reason its so high. But yea its probably just corporate greed.

[–] TheEntity@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I'm yet to see a codebase that isn't considered to be a mess.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

xenia_canary is coming along. I could play the entirety on xenia_canary on Windows... only a matter of time.

That's why I've been pushing for a whole rebuild of it. RDR2 already has New Austin and West Elizabeth fully built out in it's map. Most of the characters exist already in RDR2. Honestly, for the amount of time to "remaster" it they should just rebuild it as a DLC to RDR1, have the player immediately take off into it from the end of the game. Charge $60 bucks for it and everyone would buy it still.

[–] sneaky_b45tard@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

I already finished it on RPCS3 and can only recommend to try it out. Yes, there were a few places and cutscenes in the game that didn't run great but 98% of the time it was a smoother and better looking experience than the PS3 version, thanks to upscaling and frame rate unlocking (at least on an AMD 5800X).