this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
113 points (99.1% liked)

Open Source

29882 readers
692 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/14217789

PiVPN is no longer maintained. You can find more information here

https://github.com/pivpn/pivpn/releases/tag/v4.6.0

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

what is the alternative? I love how easy pivpn is

[–] Schorsch@feddit.de 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm going to attempt moving to wg-easy on Docker which is supposed to be, you know, easy...

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

pivpn takes care of adding and removing new clients for me. does wg easy make it convenient as well?

[–] Schorsch@feddit.de 3 points 4 months ago

As far as I know there's a web interface to sort out all that kind of stuff.

[–] B0rax@feddit.de 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes. It provides you with a very simple web interface, basically only a list with connections and a button to add a new one.

Works very good. It can not do advanced stuff, but that is not the goal anyway.

[–] B0rax@feddit.de 2 points 4 months ago

+1 for wg-easy.

It is, indeed, very easy.

[–] Lazz45@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago

I just run a wireguard container on my raspberry pi 3b and use that to VPN onto my local network. Was super simple to set up

[–] M68040@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah, that's kind of what I was wondering. Turns out you can't really do much useful with a self-hosted local VPN, but I like having the option of using one be something my VM host server provides.