this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
-193 points (7.1% liked)

Games

31343 readers
1292 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] serpineslair@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Although I disagree with some of the points (which have been mentioned in other comments), I do wish Steam had less of a monopoly. That's not to say I blame Valve, I just think there is a lack of good competitors and people willing to budge. Epic launcher is just a joke. I only use it for the free games, which is why I assume they are giving away the games for free in the first place. Not enough people use GOG. Thankful to Valve for making proton, Linux gaming would be a lot worse than it is if it weren't for proton. But damn, make a 64 bit client already, I have to use the multilib repo because it is the only 32 bit application on my system XD. EDIT: not to mention the terrible performance on some older systems.

[–] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I saw this posted a couple days ago which pretty succinctly summarizes the current state of the market.

That said, worth noting that these launchers and complex storefronts aren't really needed either, which is part of why I don't have an issue with Steam. If you have a good game, you can just sell it on your own website like Minecraft, League of Legends, or Tarkov. Steam's biggest (or at least most universal) utility for developers is just that it provides very cheap, very effective marketing.

[–] serpineslair@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Yes. The problem is that a lot of devs release their games primarily for steam, or the dreaded Microsoft Store.

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Insofar as your point is a call to action for Steam's competitors to do better with their own services, I completely agree with you. Epic & OP are whiny bitches with half-assed output that expect to be taken seriously without putting in the work. 🤌🏽

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You could try the Flatpak version. At least your OS will be clean, and the only 32-bits parts will be inside the flatpak runtimes.

[–] serpineslair@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

True, although correct me if I'm wrong, people have issues with the flatpak version? I apologise if I'm talking out my ass, I couldn't tell you what these "problems" are. It may just be a baseless claim. XD

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

After many years playing on the Flatpaked Steam, I'm yet to see any problem.

[–] serpineslair@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ahh, thanks for that, I'm probably making shit up.

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Maybe not. Like every new format, Flatpak probably had some rough edges at first, and a software as complex as Steam must have been a nightmare to convert. It was probably broken at first, but it was probably enough for some to consider it as unredeemable.