167
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
167 points (95.6% liked)
Privacy
29784 readers
1438 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
they obviously not on the same level as google and meta, and media writes often about apple not wanting to unlock a criminal's iphone in a fbi case.
average user just knows that apple doesn't give your data to 3rd party, nobody thinks about apple being the bad one here.
They couldn't unlock it. If they could, or if the criminal had used iCloud backup, they'd have done it instantly.
What the FBI wanted was for Apple to make a "rooted" iOS version and update the phone with it, and that version would give them access to everything on it.
Apple didn't want to do it because that iOS version could be used to get into any iPhone and it would've destroyed their image with their customers. Also, legally they could not be compelled to make a break-in tool.
Anyway, it was all for their own protection not for the principle of privacy.