this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
958 points (98.7% liked)

Memes

45897 readers
1139 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tsugu@slrpnk.net 31 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's worth mentioning that GIMP is mainly developed by two developers. If you wish for the development to be faster, you should consider donating.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

GIMP is an odd project, one that I'm not sure is actually being held back by money, considering they've been sitting on a donation of bitcoin since 2014 that now amounts to 1.3 million, and just... haven't used it, at all?

Krita seems like a more promising project, IMHO.

[–] yistdaj@pawb.social 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I think it should be clarified that GIMP's structure isn't able to make use of donations to GIMP as a single entity. Edit: or at least wasn't, I hear they can now.

I agree that Krita is more promising though, I switched to Krita years ago and have never looked back.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 months ago

Ah, thank you for the info, I was not aware. I hope they're able to put that money to good use now.

[–] Roldyclark@literature.cafe 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Tbh I don’t think it’s fixable. Need to make a fresh start.

[–] tsugu@slrpnk.net 8 points 9 months ago

Literally every meme I've ever made was done in GIMP. I can say that the software needs non-destructive editing that applies to transforming layers. So far there's only non-destructive effects on the layers, but discarding 20 years of work because the software is not a 1:1 copy of Photoshop seems silly.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

What are you talking about ?