Programming

16311 readers

194 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

Radicle - a sovereign peer-to-peer network for code collaboration, built on top of Git. (radicle.xyz)

submitted 4 months ago by uthredii@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hacker news discussion - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39600810 Radicle source code - https://app.radicle.xyz/nodes/seed.radicle.garden/rad:z3gqcJUoA1n9HaHKufZs5FCSGazv5

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 32 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

What's up with all the shilling posts lately?

This has existed since at least 2018 according to their Twitter, and is related to crypto currencies through its Radworks DAO

Edit : I'm not saying OP themselves is a shill. Radicle did a pretty goog job at hiding its cryptocurrency ties. They even renamed their token from Radicle to Radworks a few years ago. It seems like cryptobros are adapting to the fact that being related to cryptocurrencies hinders adoption among technical people.

[–] maiskanzler@feddit.de 16 points 4 months ago

Ah, great. Another crypto grab.

[–] elxeno@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

So we went from companies claiming to use blockchain/crypto even if they didn't use it (for any significant portion of their service), to now hiding it when they do use it?

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

They were shilling on HN too. People were getting frustrated because they were being incredibly evasive about their monetization strategy but, being HN, business model critiques were not well received...

[–] uthredii@programming.dev -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

From what I read in the HN thread the token is only used for governance (and possibly also fundraising), it is not baked into the actual platform. I am happy to be corrected though if anyone knows more/has more details.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the token is only used for governance (and possibly also fundraising)

That should make you just as worried

[–] uthredii@programming.dev -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why? It is the same power dynamic as any other open source project that is primarily built by a company.

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

Part of the issue is the whole thing smells weird.

Like they won't talk about their monetization strategy at all but they acknowledge that there will be one. They're trying to randomly apply crypto to something that's literally already the one proven blockchain tech, and they started at the height of the crypto token scam industry and it looks a lot like they're trying to suck up the last dregs of that cycle.

If you are hammering crypto into things that don't obviously need crypto you really need to justify it thoroughly. A relatively old company just hand waving all of it should raise all of the red flags.