this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
520 points (98.0% liked)

linuxmemes

19733 readers
1965 users here now

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Linuxmemed@lemmy.world
poopsmith@lemmy.world
Geert@lemmy.world
520
The first reason should be enough (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by nifty@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The base ruleset (SRD) only. Everything else is OGL, which has proven to be as open as ~~Wizards~~ Hasbro wants to make it.

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. On the face of it, it's a good move, but the full story is far worse.

  • They "updated" the OGL to be far more restrictive, impose unsustainable fees past a certain level of gross profit, and would grant WotC the full right to use, sell, and even license your work to others, irrevocably.

  • They tried to de-authorize the original OGL retroactively, fully against the spirit and practice of the license, using some legal chicanery. While the OGL 1.0a was perpetual, it didn't use the word irrevocable. (WotC's rights to your content, of course, were clearly put in irrevocable terms).

  • They only moved to CC-BY after public outcry. While the results were good, it was for PR, not out of the goodness of their hearts.

  • There's a new edition coming anyway. Unless they surprise me and put it under CC-BY as well, I'm betting they'll try again to use a really restrictive license.

Also, even though WotC walked back from de-authorizing the OGL 1.0a, the damage was done. Every publisher I'm aware of that had used it has since moved away from it entirely, with surprisingly little change to the product.

[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No argument here. I'm a PF2e player since beta and won't touch HasWizards products with a 10 foot disintegrate.

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 5 points 4 months ago

I will, begrudgingly, when my friends run a game. Playing it is okay, running it is a nightmare, and I really don't want to spend money on this game.

It's a shame, because D&D has been a huge part of my life, but nowadays, when I want to play D&D, the best way to do it isn't to use D&D.