this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
40 points (82.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

34432 readers
1807 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 months ago (17 children)
[–] Lafari@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (16 children)

Is "If B then A" equal to "B if and only if A"?

[–] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago (7 children)
[–] Lafari@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. Could you possibly elaborate? Why are they not equal?

[–] Boinkage@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Substitute common sense terms. If I say "if it is an apple, it is a fruit", does it then follow that a thing is a fruit if and only if it is an apple? No. Lots of other things are fruit without being an apple.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Better read that one again.

"If B then A" ... "B if and only if A"?

If Apple then fruit. Is Apple ONLY if it's a fruit.

This one actually checks out.

[–] Boinkage@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

If and only if is a biconditional. "b if and only if a" means "if b then a" AND "b only if a". B only if A here means "It is an apple only if is a fruit", in other words, "if it is a fruit, it could only be an apple." Which ain't right.

B -> A (if B, then A) (if apple, then fruit, correct)

B <-> A (B if and only if A) (if apple, then fruit, AND if fruit, then apple, incorrect).

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Gotcha. I was reading it aloud: "It's an Apple if and only if it's a fruit." which isn't wrong, but I guess the technical definition of "If and only if" assumes more than the words imply.

[–] hornface@fedia.io 3 points 5 months ago

"if and only if" is an unusual and sometimes confusing way to say it, but the words do directly imply the technical definition.

"it's an apple if and only if it's a fruit" literally means "it's an apple if it's a fruit" and "it's an apple only if it's a fruit". You already seem to understand the 2nd part, so no need to explain that.

The first part is a bit confusing because the words are in the reverse order compared to how people normally talk. "it's an apple if it's a fruit" means the same thing as "if it's a fruit, then it's an apple". Clearly "if it's a fruit, then it's an apple" is not a true statement, because there are plenty of other fruits apart from apples.

[–] Boinkage@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I agree, if and only if trips me up too and it doesn't fit perfectly into this logic formula. A thing is only an apple if and only if it is a fruit makes sense if you read it in a common sense way.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)