this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
220 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
2125 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You compared cheapest by cheapest, however items cost is more efficient with larger sizes

If you compare the best GB per $ sizes of both media types it is likely going to much more apart.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I compared cheapest per TB. The HDDs were most efficient at 18TB, the SSDs at 2 or 4 TB.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 2 points 10 months ago

Oh I see. I need better reading comprehension.

When I do the same calculation I come up with HDD being 4.5x cheaper per TB.