this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
847 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59206 readers
2571 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 200 Substack authors asked the platform to explain why it’s “platforming and monetizing Nazis,” and now they have an answer straight from co-founder Hamish McKenzie:

I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either—we wish no-one held those views. But some people do hold those and other extreme views. Given that, we don’t think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away—in fact, it makes it worse.

While McKenzie offers no evidence to back these ideas, this tracks with the company’s previous stance on taking a hands-off approach to moderation. In April, Substack CEO Chris Best appeared on the Decoder podcast and refused to answer moderation questions. “We’re not going to get into specific ‘would you or won’t you’ content moderation questions” over the issue of overt racism being published on the platform, Best said. McKenzie followed up later with a similar statement to the one today, saying “we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago (4 children)

So let me get this straight... They don't like Nazis, but Nazis not making money is worse than Nazis making money?

[–] SapphireVelvet84839@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

No, people writing about sexy stuff and getting paid is worse than Nazis making money.

Edit: Being fair, the bible thumpers of old who established all the laws/morals which underlie most of the regulations today would take a big big problem with people writing sexy stuff. Nazis hating Jews would not be a big problem for them.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 10 months ago

Anything related to sex or women's sexuality that's very bad.

Letting Nazi's spread their hate, that's good.

Says every social media, internet company ever.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Nazis making money and Substack not getting a cut of it is apparently worse than Nazis making money.

[–] CrayonMaster@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago

That's the part that gets me. If it were just not removing content, well, I'd probably still complain but they'd have a coherent freedom of speech argument. But... they have to pay Nazis to make Nazi content and take a cut, otherwise it's censorship and that somehow helps the Nazis?

[–] USAONE@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

They are taking a free-speech approach, I suppose.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Ah, I see we're using the SCOTUS definition of 'free speech' where money is speech.

[–] sbmc29@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

It’s 2023 and we have all the world’s knowledge at our fingertips but somehow people still have no idea what free speech is…