this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
611 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

55744 readers
6103 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
611
Suspects can refuse to provide phone passcodes to police, court rules (arstechnica.com)
submitted 6 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
94 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Suspects can refuse to provide phone passcodes to police, court rules::Phone-unlocking case law is "total mess," may be ripe for Supreme Court review.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

How come there are never 3A advocates? What if I'm really against allowing soldiers to quarter in private homes?

Edit: I probably subconsciously stole this joke from someone/somewhere in case anyone thinks I'm trying to claim it as my own.

[–] starman2112@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I'm sure if the government was doing it's damnedest to house soldiers in our apartments, there'd be more people against it. Unfortunately they're just doing their best to jail anyone they don't like.