Technology

55940 readers

3798 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

352

Supercomputer that simulates entire human brain will switch on in 2024 (www.westernsydney.edu.au)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by tsonfeir@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

138 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A neuromorphic supercomputer called DeepSouth will be capable of 228 trillion synaptic operations per second, which is on par with the estimated number of operations in the human brain

Edit: updated link, no paywall

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A Casio nothing-watch has more power than the Apollo computers

Does it?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yup. One of those cards that plays a tune when you open it is more powerful than the Apollo computer. Apollo was only working on 4kb of RAM and 74kb of ROM.

If I had been in charge of figuring out how to make that work everyone would definitely be dead.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Those cards are more powerful than the watches I'm thinking of when people say "Casio nothing-watch", I think is what I was getting at. I'm thinking simple digital watches from the 80s/90s/2000s, kind of thing. As far as I know they have no real programmable logic, and anything that might be considered RAM is under 1KB.

But yeah those cards that actually play recorded samples are probably more powerful general computers than onboard Apollo, that's a good comparison.

Still, those computers and stuff like the Saturn instrument unit were freaking marvels, considering what all they could actually do with so little.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I've been hearing that quote about watches being more powerful since I was a child in the 80s. And I think it refers to processing speed - or even moreso, calculations per energy. Sure the watches may not have as much RAM/ROM, but they work fast enough to fully update every second, and do so using little enough power to last years on a coin cell.

[–] rynzcycle@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

Houston we have no idea what our trajectory is and it's just playing happy birthday over and over.