this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2021
134 points (99.3% liked)

Open Source

30206 readers
278 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally posted on reddit by u/CipherOps .

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conno02@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i mean, i can't think of a proprietary application that does everything that blender does, so there's no need to list blender as an 'alternative' i guess.

i'm not particularly familiar with the 3d modeling space, i've only done basic stuff. feel free to correct me

[–] rndll@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I work in Architecture and fully transitioned our firm from using 3dsMax and Vray with Blender just before the pandemic started. Haven't looked back ever since. Blender does a lot of things but for the most part, it's an alternative to any mesh based 3d modeling and sculpting program. E.g. 3dsMax, Maya, C4D, Zbrush, etc.

[–] conno02@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, after reading the article, its absence is quite odd-- i guess the author thinks its hard to learn, or something.

blender is my first 3d modeling & sculpting program, and it did take me a long time (6 months) to learn. i guess there could be some merit in not including blender, but i haven't tried the other programs, so i wouldn't know

[–] rndll@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Knowing what I know now, I would say Blender is a lot easier to learn and master than 3dsMax or Maya. Blender does have some quirks that 3dsMax does easier like grouping vs collections but you can just use add-ons to do the same things. I haven't really found anything lacking with Blender that made me want to go back to Max. I'm happy to be rid of that software and just Autodesk in general.

[–] penalbatoday@mastodon.social 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

@conno02 hot take: people saying GIMP is the Alternative to Photoshop without saying its UX it's the most unusable ever. Even Krita or Affinity Photo/Designer have better user interfaces than GIMP.

[–] stardom8048@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I find GIMP so difficult to use, but I can't justify the expense of Photoshop for hobbyist use so I'm keeping at it. I wish there was something that at least had a similar UI. So many easy tasks in PS are crazy complicated in GIMP.

[–] tuts007@mastodon.social 1 points 1 year ago

@stardom8048 @penalbatoday
Did you try Photopea yet? https://www.photopea.com/

Similar experience, but free (and online)

[–] penalbatoday@mastodon.social 0 points 1 year ago

@stardom8048 i have tried Affinitity programs (one time fee to buy forever) and I have used them everyday.

[–] conno02@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

true, but i've been stockholm syndromed into GIMP and now i cant use photoshop, it's actually hilarious

[–] penalbatoday@mastodon.social 1 points 1 year ago

@conno02 if it works for you, go for it LOL

[–] IanM32@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I use Krita almost exclusively, but gimp is a lot more usable with photogimp.