this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
143 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

34388 readers
224 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skulblaka@kbin.social -1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

So where's all the folks coming out of the woodwork to tell us this isn't Technology news, then? They sure want to shit all over the comments whenever Musk is the subject, but here, in this nearly identical situation? Crickets, naturally. I've heard no other single piece of news out of this instance for five days other than the personal schedule of Sam Altman. It was good to hear about what happened once. Now we're on post 63 of the same news.

Don't get me wrong, I dislike Elongated Muskrat as much as the next guy. But there's an extremely vocal minority here that love to invade the comments on every post of anything he's done to cry about how that isn't technology news. I generally like to argue that yes, it is technology news that Twitter has refactored how their verification mark works, or that advertisers are pulling out due to offensively alt-right content being promoted by Muskrat. I also think this situation with Altman is legitimate technology news, I just like to point out hypocrisy when I see it.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

A wild Elon Musk rant has appeared, complaining about how people are complaining about how Elon Musk is irrelevant, in a thread that has nothing to do with Elon Musk.

I really have no idea how to take this.

[–] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

people should write in their diaries more often

[–] Algaroth@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Pretty sure those became blogs.

[–] maxprime@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

I see your point but this is completely different. Altman is not on the front page of every news site every day like Elon is, so I’m not sick of looking at his face like I am with Elon.

Also, being fired as CEO of one of the fastest growing (and according to many) one of the most important companies in the world, and then being hired back 3 days later is a pretty big deal and is worthy of my attention. If there are a handful of articles about it, I’m okay with that, at least for now.

[–] ShustOne@lemmy.one 7 points 9 months ago

Why is Elon Musk in this comment? He's not Technology news. Get this content out of here!

Is that what you want? But seriously the only time I see complaining is when it's not actual tech news, just some random ass tweet he put out.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

News articles about Elon's constant political clown shows aren't technology-related just because he's in charge of a few tech companies.

News articles about a CEO being fired from a tech company and then almost immediately rehired are tech-related, because they're about the tech company itself and the relevant actions of the people involved.

If this were a story about the opinions of Sam Altman, who happens to be a CEO of a tech company, about world hunger or something, that would be comparable. But it's an article about how a CEO, who happens to be Sam Altman, was fired and rehired from a tech company over the course of 3 days.

There are still obviously personalities and opinions involved, but they're in the context of technology, rather than technology being tangentially related to the context of someone's opinions.