this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
265 points (95.2% liked)

News

22838 readers
6357 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

In Utah people are allowed to turn right on red lights. But what most people don't seem to understand is, that means AFTER you've come to a stop at the intersection, and made sure it's SAFE to turn right. I've seen so many accidents here because people think if they're turning right, they don't have stop at the light - even though there's traffic coming through the green light side of the intersection. The problem isn't the law, it's that people don't pay attention and think about what they're doing. In every accident I've seen, humans not paying attention is the real cause.

[–] girltwink@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (4 children)

You're missing the point. At a right turn, traffic is coming from the left and pedestrians are coming from the right. You focus left to make sure traffic is clear and then go, meanwhile a pedestrian has entered the intersection from the right and you don't notice them.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

You stop. Look left. Then look where you're going then go. If you look left and drive without looking right, you're fucking up.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And at green lights, you don't even stop to look for pedestrians. You look while in motion. I'd figure that would actually be the less safe situation. Are there studies either way?

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I can conservatively say that 99% of the time I approach an intersection, I see all potential pedestrian crossers long before I've come to a stop, including those on the other side of the street planning to cross towards me. Pedestrians rarely appear out of nowhere, so looking left but not looking right is a poor excuse.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

99% of the time I approach an intersection, I see all potential pedestrian crossers

If you make 50 car trips a month and encounter four intersections, then you don't see two pedestrians a month. That's probably pretty accurate. Most of the time, most drivers and most pedestrians are aware, and behave safely.

Pedestrians and drivers die during that 1%.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Only applies if there aren’t bicyclists and if your view isn’t blocked. I’m sorry but your attitude is why pedestrians are dying.

[–] Baines@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

are bicyclists on the road? you should be able to see them same as a car

poor visibility of sight lanes is a different issue all together and should result on a no right turn on red sign, I have one I drive through daily due to a hill on the left

real cause is larger trucks and suvs mean most people can’t see the road in front of them

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Where I live we have a lot of separated bike lanes where most cities have sidewalks. So yes there are bikes on what you incorrectly identified as a sidewalk .

[–] Baines@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

I’ve seen those before, not a fan given how poorly they are marked

[–] snowe@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

In many locations bicyclists ride on the sidewalk, especially in high traffic situations in the USA where right turn on red is going to be deadly.

real cause is…

Yes that is one issue, but sightlines are a major one and a significant factor in why Hoboken has almost entirely eliminated pedestrian deaths while the rest of the nation continues to see them rise. Hoboken didn’t get rid of larger cars.

https://youtu.be/Fh4H9qZ-_6Y

https://youtu.be/fEj-pyjA2oo

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What people "should" do and what people actually do are two very separate concepts. Most days I ride a large motorcycle with giant panniers on it, covered by reflective shit and wearing high-viz clothing. Drivers look right at me and still don't see me, because their stupid little brains are not trained to process anything smaller than an oncoming SUV.

[–] Blackout@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago

All competent bikers ride on the road. Children and elderly and beginners ride on the sidewalk. The sidewalk is actually more dangerous because of driveways. I never see cars check before zooming straight into the street. I had commuted by bike for nearly 20 years, been hit by cars 4 times and nearly wiped out countless other times. I don't understand why cars have more rights than pedestrians and bicyclists on the road. Whatever protects pedestrians more should be automatically applied.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Cyclists should not be coming from the right (unless it's a two-way bike lane on one sided but I've only ever seen those on a one-way).

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All I hear in your excuses is, "I don't pay attention to my surroundings until I arrive at a crossing". Sorry but I think you're the danger on the road based on this.

[–] snowe@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The person I responded to literally claimed that they’re infallible and see every person approaching no matter the intersection. If that isn’t the exact definition of what you are saying I’m doing then I don’t know what is. You are clearly the danger if you think that anyone can pay attention to everything happening at all times. There’s a reason that more people die on roads in America than they do in Europe and it sure as hell isn’t because those drivers are somehow better than American drivers, it’s because vigilance doesn’t matter. Road design does.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 10 months ago

Me. The person you responded to was me. And I didn't "literally say I was infallible", i truly think you're a moron now, and I hope you pay more attention to the road than you do to this conversation.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You think pedestrians are hiding in bushes waiting to jump out?

In a densely populated city with lots of foot traffic? Sure, ban right on red, too many cars in cities to begin with.

But lots of cities have spent decades expanding and there's hardly anyone walking once you're a couple miles from downtown except for certain areas. Same for small towns.

Making it all legal one way or the other in a state just makes zero sense.

What's wrong with just putting up a sign by the light if it's not allowed?

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

The problem is it isn't zero pedestrians, it is slightly more than zero so driversquit looking as it seems there never are any and then the exception happens and they didn't look.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I can confirm that approximately 0% of drivers stop before turning right on red in my location in the Northeast, as well. I have actually had other drivers chase me through traffic to catch up with me at the next light and get out of their vehicles to threaten me because they were so angry that I stopped before turning on red, like you are legally required to do. It's absolutely insane.

People treat a right turn on red like it's their own personal green light and everyone else just has to get out of their way. They don't look to see what's coming and most of the time they don't even slow down first.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There are intersections where if you're familiar with them you know what is safe. For example at one intersection near me if I just miss the green I know the next signal is to give cross traffic left turn greens, which means no one else can be going into the lanes. I do stop, but only for a brief moment because there can always be inattentive drivers doing the wrong thing.

Of course I'm not one to really get pissed at folks for not conforming to my driving preferences, so that part is weird to me, but I do get annoyed when someone stops for like 20 seconds with no traffic. If you do that, you might get the shortest toot with my horn I can manage to wake you up if you've somehow forgotten you can turn, but that's it.

I don't go anywhere with so tight a time margin that an extra minute or two in traffic is going to matter.

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Well that annoys me too, especially when someone has both a green light and green turn arrow - and they don't go, they just sit there. I'm like - what more do you need, an engraved invitiation to go ahead and turn?? Then of course the light changes and we're all stuck waiting for the next signal.

I'm a very cautious driver, I've learned to be defensive in my driving and always keep my eyes peeled. So I do think it's better to err on the side of caution. I try to take into account that someone might be older or having eye problems or needs a few more seconds to complete a turn.

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

I live in Utah - which is bad enough, but I deal with this punitive driving malarky all the time. People getting angry at me for stopping at a red light before continuing into the turn - as if I'm the one doing something wrong!! And just where are all these people in such a frantic, panicked rush to get to that having to courteously wait for someone to turn is going to ruin their entire g-d day.

You talk about people always thinking they have a personal green light. Here in Utah, NOBODY yields right of way to anyone. In fact, every day we have more people getting hit by our Trax commuter trains because they refuse to stop for the flashing red signals and wait.

And don't think for a minute anyone here will yield right of way even if you're the one who actually has it. They never look to see if someone is coming in front or behind them - they are so oblivious to everyone else and just expect people to jump out of their way. It's really sad to see this anti-intellectual, anti-humanitarian trend in dangerous driving.

[–] RandomStickman@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If i get a dollar every time I've been honked at for stopping on a red I can live a much comfier life

[–] Neato@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Someone honks I'm going too slow? Guess we're sitting here until a green light. Turning right on red is a choice.