this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
287 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danielbln@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe, but gen AI produces actually useful, tractable results. That's already heaps more than crypto, which is just techno gambling

[–] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As long as LLM AI models are prone to hallucinating and there is no way to audit how they derive results (eg to verify accuracy), relying on them will have roadblocks/limitations. Once they solve this issue though, that will be a whole different story, I agree. As for other AIs such as image or video generation, I don't have enough experience to tell...

[–] danielbln@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hallucinations can be heavily reduced today by providing the LLM with grounding truth. People use naked LLMs as knowledge databases, which is prone to hallucinations indeed. However, provide them with verified data from the side and they are very, very good at keeping to the truth. I know, because we deploy these with clients to great avail.

Image, music, video models are making great strides and are already part of various pipelines, all the way up to the big boy tools like Photoshop (generative fill, for example).

The tech is being incorporated at a large scale by a lot of companies, from SME to megacorp. I don't see it going away any time soon, even if it doesn't improve from here on out (which it undoubtedly will).

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

The issue is that there are from time to time they still confidently hallucinate and there is no way to detect if they are right or not.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How many countries start with the letter K in Africa?

[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

GPT-4:

In Africa, there are three countries that start with the letter "K":

  1. Kenya
  2. Kingdom of Eswatini (although it's often referred to simply as Eswatini)
  3. Kiribati

However, it's worth noting that Kiribati is not in Africa; it's a Pacific island nation. So, only Kenya and the Kingdom of Eswatini in Africa start with the letter "K", but most people just refer to Eswatini without the "Kingdom" prefix. If you meant countries solely with the prominent "K" at the start, then it's just Kenya.

Anecdotal evidence is useless because it can be contradicted with anecdotal evidence.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hallucinations aren't the only issue with LLMs, they also have a limited amount of context they can recall and that problem won't go away.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

that problem won’t go away

That problem is very much being worked on

[–] Cheers@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

This mentality is the same as saying Wikipedia is not a source. I agree, there are better regulations that need to be implemented, but the speed at which these things are being churned out and tuned is mind blowing. It's like if Wikipedia started branching off into sub categories that each have their own specialty, which can be more easily moderated, and then folded back into the more general system.