xcjs

joined 1 year ago
[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

I still have it on my Pixel 8 Pro. It requires a double tap to occur in less than 300 seconds.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

This bug has been the bane of my existence for almost four years now: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/204650736

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 26 points 1 week ago

The Android version of the app still has the zoom/cursor offset bug when using a software keyboard from when they sunset RDP 8. That has been a severe usability bug for over three years now.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

CSV only exports data, not formulas. I don't really consider it a proper spreadsheet interchange format.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It would be extremely barebones, but you can do something like this with Pandoc.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Not the person you're debating (and I'm on your side here), but what's up with all the revisionist history going on lately?

"This thing you're arguing for was never the intent."

Then what was the intent you dimwit?

And they never have an answer aside from acting like it was some grave oversight that was only recently caught as a mistake.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That is exactly a function of a jury.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"What you say disagrees with my world view, so I'm just going to pretend you're crazy and your words don't make sense."

I've had this exact tactic used against me - it's very transparent when used and weakens your position.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

I get what you're saying, and yet it exists and a term exists for it.

I know there's no "nullification" verdict and the binary guilty/not guilty are the only recognized options, but nullification is used to describe the not guilty verdict despite any charges and evidence in a trial, which I'm sure you understand.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I don't think her decision to take the deal took into account whether jury nullification exists or not. The way you explained it sounds like retrocausality, though I don't know if that's the way you meant it.

Jury nullification isn't about fair outcomes, I should clarify, but about whether the law itself is lawful, representative of the people, or applied lawfully. Maybe that fits into the definition of fair I had in mind, but I was thinking on it more objectively, not subjectively.

There are proponents and opponents within the United States, true, but if a legal system does not permit punishment of jurors, then jury nullification is a logical byproduct of the system. And an important one I would argue. It fits into why trials by jury are important in a democratic legal system - the people have the final say, whether they realize it or not.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Whether a jury feels a charge is fair is the whole reason trial by a jury of peers exists.

It's a feature of the system, not a bug.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

It'll probably be there, but at least it can be disabled in the settings now. It won't go away on its own.

view more: next ›