voluble

joined 5 months ago
[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

The claim that 'the people who killed Nijjar were too young to be state actors' is fallacious to begin with. It's even more tenuous in light of everything else that's known about the murder.

It goes without saying that there's no reason to give any weight to India's denial of involvement. That's all that really needs to be said about that.

Canada expelled an Indian diplomat. There's no reason to do that if India wasn't involved. There's no reason for India not to cooperate with investigations if they're not involved. We know that Five Eyes intelligence exists that makes a connection between the assassination and the Indian government. The intelligence itself hasn't been disclosed (and never will be - sources & methods, etc). So, waiting for that kind of disclosure before forming an opinion on this is folly at best.

The current Canadian government is horribly weak on matters of foreign interference, so if they've been mealymouthed regarding this assassination, I don't think that casts doubt on India's involvement. If anything, it's a suggestion of the opposite.

Given the degraded state of Canada's current foreign policy, it's expected that they would tiptoe around confirming a direct link between India and the assassination, and may choose to never confirm it. That doesn't mean we should infer that a link doesn't exist.

With all that in mind, I don't see any reason to conclude that India wasn't involved.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (13 children)

alleged

Dude. For real?

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Didn't look too big this evening, but was very close to the highway. Stay safe everyone.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Their menu increasing contradicts the core principles of taste.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

It would be interesting if there was a federal party with big ideas and detailed policy proposals worth actually getting behind.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lol. Out of curiosity, are you hearing this from management, or from staff on the floor?

If prices are so high that a store inspires a unified national boycott, jobs loss (if it happens) can actually be blamed directly on the prices!

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Not going to steal, but definitely will boycott for the month of May.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As a millennial with a not-amazing but decent paying job, the notion of retirement at all is laughable. What incentive do people like me have to save, when inflation and cost of living are on the trajectory that they're currently on? Putting money away at this point just means less money for groceries, rent, and enjoyable things. And in 5 years, that saved money will be worth less than it is today.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Minimum pricing in AB, AFAIK, is regulated on the wholesale price of the product. So, producers are regulated, but retail stores aren't prevented from competition, loss leaders, stunts, etc., which is what this might be.

Given that the tax money from alcohol/tobacco just goes into provincial and federal slush funds that proportionately end up being funneled into seniors benefits, I don't believe minimum pricing really addresses the things that people think it does. I'm an advocate of directing alcohol taxes towards the harms it creates. But, try to find a politician who wants to grind that axe. I say this as someone who enjoys a good beverage, & acknowledging the pragmatic importance of offsetting the healthcare costs of alcohol abuse. I don't believe that simply making a good more expensive is the wisest move on the policy side, if healthcare outcomes are the ultimate target.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Alberta does have minimum prices for both wholesale as well as on-premise liquor.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

For the interested, my estimate is that $34.28 of this sticker price is liquor tax.

Federal excise is $13.93 per litre of absolute alcohol. Normally, AB provincial liquor tax is $13.76 per litre of volume, but this 4L is probably self-distributed by an AWP producer. They get reduced rates that scale based on the volume of production. Here, I'd guess it's something like $3 per litre of volume.

[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

AB government advocacy for local craft producers: Drake no

AB government advocacy for gambling and cannabis: Drake yes

The liquor regulation system in Alberta is prohibitionary already. What changes would you want to see?

view more: ‹ prev next ›