spooky2092

joined 1 week ago

But I was in DC on the 6th, and let me tell you that the people I saw wearing the red hats were “normal”.

Having grown up with a meth addict parent, you may not know what to look for in otherwise "normal" adults who are meth addicts. If they have the self control not to let the drug take over, they can live for years without showing any outward signs of their habit. It's amazing how long some people can be functioning adults and addicted.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Legit tho, has AI ever not been used to discriminate in situations like this?

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 week ago

The zodiac killer

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

The republican party

I know, I repeat myself

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 week ago

Calling it indentured slavery implies they may be able to earn their freedom.

Interesting. Guessing that probably means I need to find a new trick when I go to work on newer servers. Damned microsoft....

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In plasma donation, you get the blood put back without the plasma, so I wouldnt count on it actually filtering out the pfas.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a good idea, but it will only ever be that with the way the US works. Getting 2/3 of Congress and the states to agree on anything is borderline impossible.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Try

Control printers

Much easier

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're not mocking the misidentification of the salute, they're trying to muddy the waters to dilute the accusations, like they have every single time something wants to stick. This is their standard playbook, as is the tone policing that comes with it.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So is your argument is that satire isn't a thing? Because this is rather clearly a satirical meme, and that kind of ridicule by inversion is pretty solidly a feature of satirical works.

Irl it was an obviously intentional act that was claimed to be an accident, and this is an accident that is mockingly taking something that's clearly an accident and describing it like it was intentional but trying to claim it was an accident, to make fun of how utterly unbelievable the original claim is by contrasting it with the same argumentation of something that is very unlikely to be intentional.

I think your mistake is thinking this is a counter argument rather than just mocking their idiocy with some really dry satire.

view more: ‹ prev next ›