softcat

Yes

Depends on the extent of how much you'd do and if you'd get noticed, really. Leverage being applied against you or your parents could occur, particularly to or via relatives in China, but only if you're deemed worth the effort. I wouldn't take that risk, personally, but that's a very specific, individual decision.

The US is another matter. Sure you'll go on a list but everyone's on a list of one kind or another, we're both on one for using Lemmy most likely.

Would there be any validity in your parents thinking your concerns about this are getting in the way of improving your own life?

Is this not just...termux?

he looks very determined

This seems completely uncritical of Carney and Canada for that matter. The future isn't going to be lead without force because a middle power elects a prime minister with some good ideas about markets.

We don't need to rely on wars? We rely on exploitation even without it- ask any country where our mining firms operate with lax regulation. Hell, we've participated in "coalitions of the willing" in invasions and aerial bombings for corporate giants too. Most of this country is content to think the first Nations just decided to give us the land.

I'm happy to vote for more years of basically Trudeau lite and I have no illusions about it.

Superpower? Alright no need to chug the Kool aid this hard, let's wait until you find a chapter where he wants to develop a nuclear triad.

He's a traditional liberal which means not all that progressive beyond what's popular socially. Good for the wealthy fiscally, and maintained decline for everyone else. If you want to see what it'll be, look at the UK while he was heading up BoE. Or any Canadian Liberal government through the 90s-00s.

Despite all this he and his party obviously remain the superior choice to PP, but let's not kid ourselves. He's not going to neolib us into utopia.

Say "McDonald's!" to continue ride

I'm not sure the answers so far get to the gist of the problem- how to create these institutions in balance of power, where they can't just co-opt or capture one another.

I don't think it's possible to prevent one institution from actively deciding to give up and relinquish its responsibilities, without constraining or bolstering them to where they can't act as balances.

If they want power they find a way.

Making the same joke about the senator will result in the FBI breaking down your door. Funny how that works.

Revenue stream