snaggen

joined 1 year ago
[–] snaggen@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago

Well, Perl is great for small scripts that works on large texts, that you process with regex. I still use Perl from time to time, for that kind of scripts. Also commandline, instead of awk/sed...

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I learend it in the 90s, and was working on a large Perl codebase 2005 and a couple of years forward. And 20 years, it still started to feel dated, and 15 years ago it was just so out dated it hurt. So, starting to learn Perl 20 years ago would not have been great :) However, the things making Perl horrible, is pretty much threre in Python also with the addition of significant whitespace... so technically, going from Python to Perl might actually be a step in the right direction.... Now, if you excuse me, I will hide behinde this huge rock for a while to let the incoming projectiles settle.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

No, it is not based on Gnome. It is a full DE environment written in rust.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The problem with assassin the Russian economy, is to do it faster then it commit suicide.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 13 points 4 months ago

Not the latest, but one of the biggest improvements was the Ultimate Hacking Keyboard. Now I have programmed the keyboard to have VIM navigation at the keyboard level. The latest was switching to neovim and setting it up properly.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Of course cars would loose if you tried to use it to travel across the Atlantic...

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

But per mile measurement for flying implies that every mile of a flight is equally dangerous, but the truth I'd that it is most dangerous to start or land, which is a per trip occurrence. The take off and landing is equally dangerous whether you travel a long or short distance in between.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And the question is am I going to die on this trip? And there the real statistics are pretty clear, cars are safer.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Well, what I want to know is "Am I going to die today?". The distance traveled is irrelevant to answer that question. The only reason to add that to the equation is to make air travel look safer.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Per trip is more in line with how people think about danger. Like, am I going to die on this trip?

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago (13 children)

I think you underestimate the number of trips per car per day. Most people will take more trips by car per month than they will fly for their lifetime. In Sweden , a country of 10 million, we have about 150 people killed per year from car accidents, yet most adults travel by car daily. That is millions of trips per day, and only half a death.

view more: ‹ prev next ›