qjkxbmwvz

joined 10 months ago
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's completely context dependent; you're right that using male/female is appropriate for humans in certain contexts, e.g., medical usage ("Patient, a 47yo female, presented with..."). But it is


for cultural and historical reasons


generally considered inappropriate to refer to our fellow humans that way in conversation.

Re: mutt, fair enough. Bitch/stud are examples of how animal terms, when applied to humans, take on very different meanings. Purebred is afaik not specific to species, but it is wildly inappropriate to refer to people as such.

At the end of the day, the logic behind what is and is not appropriate has history behind it; animal terms have been used extensively to refer to subjugated peoples; it may be scientifically accurate but that doesn't mean that it's inoffensive.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Of course we're animals, but let's use some common sense wrt cultural norms here. A dog of mixed lineage is mutt, but it's completely inappropriate to refer to a multiracial person as such. A female dog is a bitch, a male is a stud; the sexism is pretty obvious when applied to humans. It's fine to talk about owning a dog; it's not ok to talk about owning another human (except perhaps children, in certain contexts).

Yes, we are animals too, but that doesn't mean we should talk about each other in the same way. (And I say this as a vegetarian who thinks we should treat all animals with significantly more respect than we currently do.)

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 26 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Unless we want to use group pronouns like we do with animals.

I'm pretty sure that's exactly why referring to women as "females" is problematic


using male/female as nouns is fine for animals. Humans, not so much...

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 15 points 2 weeks ago

UPS and American companies in general

But this is USPS, which isn't an American company, it's a US independent agency.

Their mandate isn't (AFAIK...) to make a profit, but rather to serve the mail requirements of a very large country.

Personally, my experiences with USPS have been generally positive, from passports for infants to free change-of-address forwarding service to tracking down quasi-scam products from Amazon. YMMV though.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 3 points 2 weeks ago

Anyway, how's your sex life?

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I think there's a bias in the US against this sort of thing that doesn't exist (or not to the same extent) in Europe due to the age of the cities/buildings.

In the US, a building from the 1700s is a historic artifact to be cherished, while in parts of Europe a building from the 1500s is just the local pub.

So, the US is often hesitant to modify these old buildings, but Europe seems to have more of a perspective of "it's a building, not a museum, let's give it new life by modifying it."

This is just from the perspective of me, from the US


and I think these old/new buildings are really neat!

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

In English, it's usually used in a context where there's some humor, frustration, or irony involved, like in the comic.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not to mention mortgage interest.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

If I wanted to give it a bold facelift I'd just use the top one and remove the letters. Gives it an arrogant, "if you have to ask what this is..." vibe, which is probably a good thing for them.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

IIRC that was the release that cleaned up the make output substantially.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 9 points 1 month ago

Not on Netflix in my region :(

view more: ‹ prev next ›