mulcahey

joined 4 months ago
[–] mulcahey@lemm.ee 5 points 5 days ago

UPDATE: Switching to Firefox ESR seems to have solved this issue!

[–] mulcahey@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So I'm looking for a script that disables all power settings when Firefox is playing a full screen video, but then re-enables them when the video closes.

Does anyone have that script?

[–] mulcahey@lemm.ee -1 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I've tried disabling the screensaver in power settings (not via script). But I have to keep some power settings so that my machine goes to sleep when not in use and the TV turns off.

So whatever my power settings are, they will kick in. If I disable screensaver but I have a 30 min sleep timer, the comp will go to sleep, even if I'm watching a movie in Firefox.

Typically, turning off my TV looks like this:

  • I close a tab that's playing a movie.
  • Firefox reverts to my home tab, showing all my streaming sites.
  • I get up and walk away
  • My computer goes to sleep
  • My TV, not getting any input from the computer, turns off.

If I go the script route, it might screw up that sequence, right?

 

I've been a Firefox user for 15+ years. I love its flexibility, privacy, and (absent that rough patch in the mid 2010s) its speed. It really is a great browser. But I've hit a limitation.

One of my machines is an HTPC running Linux. I watch almost all my movies in the browser via streaming sites. At first, Firefox was ideal for this: it handles fullscreen browsing well (better than Brave) by letting me access tabs just by moving my mouse to the top of the screen. And I'm able to adjust the scale of the Firefox interface to make it more HTPC-friendly via about:config. That's not possible in Brave.

But Firefox has 2 issues that make it virtually unusable as an HTPC browser.

  1. When Firefox plays fullscreen video (on Linux), it can't stop the screensaver from coming on. This issue has sprung up repeatedly for over a decade and been reported multiple times.
  2. Extensions like Keep Awake/Caffeine do not work with Firefox on Linux. I use these extensions so that I can keep non-video sites (like Rollgator) on my TV screen persistently, without the screensaver coming on.

I'm bummed. I would rather use Firefox, with its great interface and its long history. I still use Firefox on my phone, laptop, and desktop. But at the moment, Brave is the only browser (of the two) that has addressed these issues on Linux. If that ever changes, I will happily come back to Firefox on my HTPC. (It would be great, because then I could easily send tabs from my devices to my TV!) Until then, I'm sticking with Brave.

[–] mulcahey@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah WTF is this art, this is NOT the way to do it.

Like, even if you don't care about antisemitism and genocide...

The Nazis were not great about privacy

[–] mulcahey@lemm.ee 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fun fact about the original Sim City: the lead developer said that they wanted to model real cities in the game, but "we quickly realized there were way too many parking lots in the real world and that our game was going to be really boring if it was proportional in terms of parking lots."

Source

[–] mulcahey@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Thank you for this clear, helpful answer

[–] mulcahey@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago (5 children)

But... Why? Why would they get different restrictions on the basis of operating system?

[–] mulcahey@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Sounds like that's in here:

"The test build shows the horizontal tab bar and the sidebar at the same time by default. A click on the new "hide tab strip" button hides the horizontal tab bar so that only the vertical sidebar remains."

[–] mulcahey@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Agreed. There's a slight relief here, though: I believe this is the Times Square shuttle train, which only runs back and forth over a few stations and never goes outside. So at least you're not on this train for long and never missing a view

[–] mulcahey@lemm.ee 61 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Folks are asking "Why post this here?" I get the question but I think I also get the OP, as a New Yorker who was surprised to see this ad IRL.

Most of our subway ads are for VC-funded Internet darlings (think: mattresses-by-mail, kitschy underwear, online therapy) or for some aspiring blockbuster movie from an Internet giant.

Until I saw this ad, I had never in my life seen a subway ad for a company I actually used, let alone respected.

Seeing this ad in the wild broke my brain. I have advocated for online privacy for over a decade. I have spent so much energy pushing people to use Signal. But I had never before imagined that "online privacy" was a concept that could find an audience in mass marketing.

I don't know if Mullvad will take off. But I know that seeing these ads moved me. I felt like maybe, MAYBE, our movement is breaking through.

[–] mulcahey@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cool article but Wired already published this 2 years ago. Wonder why they're repubbing?

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/car-free-cities-opposition

view more: next ›