luckyhunter

joined 10 months ago
[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Who thought this was a secret? they lead OPEC for crying out loud.

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

The bombings will continue until moral improves.

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

what law are they accusing them of breaking then?

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

I don't see them saying anything about it.

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

It means they don't think they can prove a law was broken.

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (5 children)

It doesn't even say but I assume this is a civil suit? you can sue for any reason you can think of in civil court. It doesn't mean you are correct. If this is a criminal suit then you have to tell the court what law was broken.

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

What laws have they violated, and why haven't the plaintiffs referenced it?

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Hiring marketing consultants to help you figure out how best to sell your product is perfectly legal. This lawsuit isn't even claiming a violation of any laws.

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

That's even pushing it. there's the common understanding of collusion, which this could maybe fall under, but doesn't matter legally. And then there's the legal definition of collusion which they aren't being accused of. The article doesn't say what law they are violating, or even if the suit is claiming they are.

[–] luckyhunter@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Besides being a stupid business model, what is illegal about hiring a consultant to advise you how to run your business? There can't be a law saying all landlords MUST lease out all their properties is there?

view more: next ›