janonymous

joined 1 year ago
[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Not attempting stand-up, too

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Okay, a bunch of thoughts come to mind.

I love Diablo. However, I think a big part of it is the atmosphere and also me being young and never having seen anything like it. That's pretty hard to recreate. I heard the game Halls of Torment nailed the Diablo atmosphere, but as a Vampire Survivors-like. Basically it's focused on the grind and progression. Maybe, that's something for you? Personally, I haven't found anything that is as fun as Diablo, so every now and then I play Diablo 1 with a new mod, like the new The Hell 3 Mod. It brings back the wonder of the unknown, because there is lots of new stuff in there. I also loved Book of Demons, which is basically a streamlined version of Diablo 1 with a dark comedic twist.

I think you underestimate the satisfaction that comes from clearing levels in Diablo. Yes, it could be a different theme and still work, but isn't that proof of how potent it is? So the question is, why does it feel like a grind to you? I wager it's because the magic Diablo had for you got lost over time. You know how they work now, you've seen behind the curtain and thus don't feel the danger, the intrigue like you used to. Maybe you will find it in games like Elden Ring that you don't see through right away?

About the stats progression: I think a very big part of the fun of progressing your character comes from doing it the way you want. It's a form of expression. You want to be a Necromancer that only uses Golems or a Mage focused on ice. I think what a lot of Diablo-likes miss is finding a good way to allow lots of expression in character development. Too often I feel boxed in by the class and it doesn't feel like it's my Tinkerer, but the Tinkerer instead. A good Diablo-like has abilities that define the character instead of just simple stat increases and cooldown reductions and all that.

Lastly, if you haven't seen it there is a great Diablo 4 Critique on YouTube that might give some more food for thought!

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I can see our difference in how we defined what's shoe-horned in. And I get that you're not saying diversity in media is bad. However, respectfully, I don't think your definition of shoe-horned makes a lot of sense if you think it through. Is the music shoe-horned in, because it's not critical to the plot? You said yourself that adding information that isn't critical to the plot is necessary or the movie will be bland. If it's necessary to the movie, wouldn't you agree that it is critical? It may not be for the plot, but it is for the movie. Movies aren't just plot. A lot of great movies (Nomadland, Patterson, Dazed and Confused, Coffee and Cigarettes, The Straight Story, ...) don't have a lot of plot or tell a great story. Instead they focus on the characters and the mood.

I think your example with the "blond, blue eyed, straight white men" betrays your perspective. This isn't describing the default human being. Most people on earth aren't like that. But it is the de facto default in western media. Why is it that? Because for a long time it was white men who made the decisions. Now that it has become a norm, everything that deviates needs a justification. And that's kinda fucked up, isn't it?

So, I think the question isn't, why don't "normal" character traits get the same hate as "alternate" traits? The question is, who defines what is normal?

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

That's kind of a weird argument. I always took "shoe-horned" to imply that it is pressed into something by force where it doesn't quite fit. So, in my mind just because something is intentional doesn't mean it is shoe-horned.

Creative works always come from the authors lived experiences. The reason why we often find representation of minorities missing in media, is because these minorities don't get to work on them. If there would be more diverse teams working on something we would naturally see more of their diverse experiences represented.

However, for this to be the case a lot would have to change in our society. It is way easier to just keep things more or less as they were and let people without minority experiences write and add minority characters. These, in turn, feel off, feel shoe-horned in, because they aren't based off of lived experiences. They are just there to check a box.

Conversely, the reason why it feels like we used to have better (though less) diverse representations in media is because these actually came from people who had these experiences.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

He does, too

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Mir geht es genauso. Ich krieg mittlerweile kleine Panik-Attacken beim Lemmy und Mastodon scrollen und werde da dieses Wochenende zumindest mal eine Pause einlegen. Die Zeitungen, Talk- und Newssendungen ertrage ich schon eine Weile nicht mehr.

Ich habe das Gefühl wir werden von Karrieregeilheit und Angst regiert. Aber was wir brauchen ist Ehrlichkeit und Menschlichkeit.

Auf der einen Seite kann ich einfach nicht mehr, auf der anderen hab ich das Gefühl, dass ich auch nicht nichts machen kann. Darum schreibe ich an einem Brief den ich diversen Politikern dann handgeschrieben zukommen lassen möchte. Das scheint mir der effektivste Weg da noch irgendwen zu erreichen.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Klar, ich erwarte jetzt nicht, dass die schmilzt sobald man heißes Wasser reinfüllt. Aber nachdem immer wieder Studien rauskommen, dass sich aus verschiedenen Plastiksorten dann doch Stoffe über Zeit rauslösen, wenn sie warm werden, hab ich da einfach kein Vertrauen mehr, auch wenn es angeblich sicher sein soll. Aber das darf gern jeder für sich entscheiden.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Bei der stört mich, dass alles aus Plastik ist und ich da heißes Wasser reingießen soll.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not sure if it's underrated, but Sunshine (2007) is really great!

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Das gleiche könnte man in Sachsen auch über Die Linke sagen. Aber ob das geschickter ist eine 5% Partei mehr drin zu haben statt einen großen Gegenpol mit der CDU zu haben, weiß ich nicht.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dem kann ich nur zustimmen. Wobei sie Situation für geflüchtete Menschen noch wesentlich schlechter ist, als den meisten Menschen bewusst. Selbst wenn sie deutsch sprechen, sind Termine bei Behörden oder Ärzten kaum ohne Übersetzer machbar. Aber von denen gibt es viel zu wenige und die bereits überarbeiteten Menschen, die ihnen dann gegenüber sitzen, haben weder die Geduld noch das Verständnis, um ihnen angemessen zu helfen. Das Leben in Deutschland ohne ausgezeichnete Deutschkenntnisse und Verständnis für unsere Bürokratie ist verwirrend und frustrierend selbst wenn man sich Mühe gibt. Und dazu kommen dann noch direkte und indirekte Anfeindungen, weil man sie falsche Hautfarbe hat.

Das Problem, dass wir mit der Aufnahme von Migranten haben, ist dass unser öffentliche Institutionen sowieso schon unterbelegt und überarbeitet sind. Das zu verbessern würde uns allen zugute kommen!

Wir müssen endlich aufhören Migration und Flüchtlinge als Probleme zu behandeln! Das sind Chancen! Das sind helfende Hände, die da kommen. Das sind Menschen, die nichts anderes wollen als sich hier ein gutes Leben zu erarbeiten. Was für eine Bereicherung sie sein könnten, auch kulturell! Aber statt sie wirklich willkommen zu heißen, werden sie wie Probleme behandelt. Wen kann es wundern, wenn sich von diesen Menschen einer beschließt Probleme zu machen? Mich wundert, dass es nicht mehr sind.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

...because they know how to swear in Russian?

332
🍿🍿🍿 (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by janonymous@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
 

Edit: I'm not actually opposed to watching movies with directors cuts. Just realized I love watching ridiculously long video essays about movies, but almost never watch directors commentaries. Not sure why, probably availability.

Also I heightened the phrasing for comedic purposes ;)

view more: next ›