Wait so then does playing a game that maxes out my GPU for two hours use enough power to charge 1000 smartphones?
Because that's a lot.
greater_potater
joined 11 months ago
Yes, a server owner can see what is played. But this is sending email summaries about what I am watching on my own server. Even if that friend is not invited to my particular server, and even libraries that I haven't shared with anyone.
It doesn't even matter if I'm embarrassed by what it sends. That information is private. Period.
I got blindsided by this in the same way. I was sitting next to a coworker and they said "Oh hey, a report on what you've been watching on Plex!"
Now, I thought that it was reporting what I'd been watching on his Plex server, and I've always known he can see what I watch. But he showed me the email. It was stuff I'd been watching on my own Plex server.
Now it wasn't embarrassing stuff, as it's my family Plex server, but I was absolutely livid. This is private. Period. I can think of many, many reasons that someone would want to keep this private, even if it's not about porn.
I alerted my friends, and we all figured out how to turn it off. It seems like it shouldn't be that big of a deal, but I feel extremely violated. I absolutely know that someone in that meeting said "Hey, some users won't like this," and they were overridden. Because some senior director had a metric to hit. And that means they no longer care about their reputation. It's a sign that they've gotten too big to care.
hopefully this is just a ‘blip’ and rates of theft begin to fall again as the economy recovers.
If not, we can expect to see legal channels raising their prices again to cover the losses caused by piracy.
This is a crazy thing to write. Every streaming service already has their prices set at whatever they think will maximize profit. If they raise prices in response to piracy, they'll push even more people away.
If anything, piracy will serve as competition, and it will cause the streaming services to lower prices.
Reminder for everyone that when there are efforts to change the system and have employers pay higher wages instead, the majority of workers are vehemently against it.
You'll see people in this thread telling you that it's not the workers' fault, and that taking it out on the workers by not tipping is not fair, as if they're victims of the system.
Most pressure to maintain the system (or add tips to new industries) comes from the workers, and I feel that not tipping is entirely appropriate if you want it to change.
When the workers themselves start clamoring for raising wages and getting rid of tipping culture, I will empathize with them more.
It depends on a lot of factors, like how my productivity is measured, how long is the commute, etc. but in general I'd pick the 4 days in the office.
It can be hard to support the first amendment when you disagree with what's being said, but that's why it's so important.
No, whether you qualify for overtime is based on a bunch of factors including job responsibilities and industry. But there are two salary thresholds that basically ignore those rules.
At the lower end, if you make less than a certain amount, you qualify for overtime no matter what, regardless of whether your job would normally qualify. This is the one they're proposing increasing.
At the higher end, your employer doesn't have to pay you overtime no matter what. This one is six figures, though I don't remember the exact amount.
I think the edit may have made it even more confusing for newcomers.