dumbcrumb

There are a few good freelance transcription gigs online. I did rev.com in high-school and it was really easy. You basically just listen to an audio clip and type out what it's saying. More difficult clips pay more but I think I was able to get something like 12-14 an hour doing it.

I think its a metal pin

Wait so if you're in the ocean near a lightning strike you'll be fine?

Avocado oil is really good, and it's important to have a super thin layer of oil. Just put a little in the pan and then evenly coat it with a papertowel and wipe out as much oil as possible.... and then wipe it out some more. It will look like there's nothing there and thats how you want it. Place in the oven on its highest setting like 450+ for 45min, let it cool a bit and then do it again. You should do this 3-4 times for a nice seasoning.

Steel wool to take off the rust and re-season

One reason for us not being in a simulation is that we have irrational numbers that are seemingly infinite. Like pi. In every simulation that we are able to do, there is a limit to how precise the simulation is. For example, using pi only to 10 digits is more than accurate enough for any simulation we want to run. If we currently live in a simulation, then we could assume that the creators would do the same thing to save on computing power, but we have found many irrational numbers that never end. There is also the argument that the parameters of the simulation would be dynamic and change depending on more and more precise observation, but obviously, that's impossible to know.

This varies wildly depending on what species and how it was caught. Fish with really thin lips like largemouth are generally perfectly fine after being released.

Thats actually pretty cool

Look up cunk on earth

Yea I remember switching to prusa slicer because of this and I also seem to get nicer prints aside from seams not being great but I alsp haven't put much effort into trying to fix that. Never lost my settings on prusa.

Happens to me all the time but not with only 2-4 times. Maybe once ive said it like 15-20 times

Because when you ask it to solve a math problem it isn't actually solving the problem like you and I would. It's taking your input and comparing it to the data that it has previously been trained on to give the most likely response. If it was actually properly solving the problem, then it wouldn't mess up on simple stuff. You can see this if you just give it a math problem that isn't commonly completed, like a few multiplications of large numbers in a row. It will just spit out some random large number that isn't even close.