douglasg14b

joined 1 year ago
[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So..... Throw them in jail? Make them accountable? Revoke the companies ability to do business till the records are provided?

Then again, that's just fantasy because the laws don't matter if you're Rick/big enough anymore.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 5 points 9 months ago

Incredibly easy to miss, damn.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 20 points 9 months ago (11 children)

Honestly?

Heat death of the universe.

Our biology is hardwired for tribalism.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Really, victim blaming?

Get out of here with that low quality crap.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The wrong lesson?

I'm not sure how reducing your attack surface area is the wrong lesson here.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Definitely distopian, corporate power and entrenchment grows every year.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 9 points 9 months ago

Probably because of the "you can't be sexist against males" standpoint

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, it's technical topics I care about, and have a hard time with in current search engines.

There is so much noise caused by celebrity news, current events, "hot topics", politics, "top 10" list spam, SEO gaming....etc that searches on Google, bing, and ddg are just frustrating.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is literally "nuh uh" quality discussion. We get it, you like SearXNG, are you actually trying Kagi?

I just tried a few SearXNG instances and the quality is the same as what I get from Google or Bing anyways.

Trying out Kagi now to see if it's better or not.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago

They probably have a lot of potential infrastructure savings. $1/80 searches is an absolutely astronomical cost.

I'm imagining there are quite a few gains they can get by way of optimization, different technologies, and optimizing hot paths to bring that number down.

It really depends how they built this thing. For instance, if they built this on the AWS ecosystem, using more than straight compute/K8, their costs are going to be an actual order of magnitude higher than if they didn't.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That'd be weird if they couldn't, there's no way they can improve their search engine other than by watching the way users use it.

Otherwise it exists in a vacuum.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

browsers themselves are easy to make

That's ... a patently false statement.

They are among the most complex, difficult, resource hungry pieces of software out there along with actual operating systems.

There's a lot of open source browsers out there. Are you using them? Probably not

This is also essentially misinformation. I'm sure none of us have heard of Firefox before, or Chromium. Sure Chrome (closed source) is what most people use, but Firefox isn't exactly some esoteric browser.

view more: ‹ prev next ›