[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 127 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Let's not pretend it's all about "bad actors". They don't want masked traffic at all, the "bad actors" gives them an excuse.

And we know this because if the IP was the issue, they wouldn't let you use the site at all, but they will work fine after signing in. Any of these VPNs work as long as you're logged into reddit, even with a throwaway account.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 131 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Are Microsoft a big, evil company?

A. No, that’s insanely reductive. They’re super smart people, and sometimes super smart people make mistakes. What matters is what they do with knowledge of mistakes.

I have no doubt there are smart employees, but they don't call the shots. Case in point.

The dude set up a strawman argument, then didn't even bother to burn it down properly.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 105 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I get this is the go-to response now, for good reason, but there isn't really anything too shady going on with this particular case at least not from Google. This is more about them trying to keep SEOs from figuring out how they rank things so they can't pollute the search results even more.

Every comment is shitting on Google but here is the what the SEO expert said about the leak when it was presented to them:

This person’s sole aim appeared quite aligned with my own: to hold Google accountable for public statements that conflict with private conversations and leaked documentation, and to bring greater transparency to the field of search marketing. And they believed that, despite my years removed from SEO, I was the best person to share this publicly.

https://sparktoro.com/blog/an-anonymous-source-shared-thousands-of-leaked-google-search-api-documents-with-me-everyone-in-seo-should-see-them/

Just read through that blog. Look at the absolute indignity these SEO assholes have at the idea that the search engine wouldn't tell them exactly how to fuck it up with their garbage.

This is entirely about advertising. Hell, the leaker revealed their identity, and it's the guy that runs this company:

https://eaeagledigital.com/

Companies like this and the assholes behind them are a cancer on the internet and they have been for a very long time. You cannot point the finger at Google and not also point the finger at them, they are the other half of the shit equation.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 104 points 1 month ago

Kind of wish they would stop trying to push this as "editing".

If all you can do is draw on top of it, you're not actually editing it.

I'm not shaming them, I understand why they can't have a full built-in PDF editor, but people that don't know any better are going to open it up expecting an actual editor and be disappointed.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 104 points 2 months ago

It is shocking because they did it after the investigation had started, which is monumentally stupid.

You can destroy any records you want at any time, unless there's an investigation underway or you have good reason to believe one will be starting. At that point, you're destroying evidence.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 116 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What’s more, developers tell us that Meta’s motivation behind the API’s shutdown is unclear. On the one hand, it could be that Facebook Groups don’t generate ad revenue and the shutdown of the API will leave developers without a workaround. But Meta hasn’t clarified if that’s the case.

No, that's definitely it, you got it.

The promises of web 2.0 simply can't survive in the capital-poisioned wasteland the Internet has become.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 121 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The use of "sentenced to life" here is one of the most blatant click/ragebait headlines I've seen in a while. And looking at the comments, people are eating it up.

He has not been sentenced to life. He's in a hospital until deemed fit to release, because he's destroying property, injuring people, and declaring a desire to return to crime.

Yeah, it's funny when it's Rockstar, less so when it's your social media or bank. If he can't bring himself to at least commit to saying he won't do something illegal just to get through court, then his lack of self control speaks to someone who's going to do some shit and wind up arrested again.

If the staff can get him to calm down enough to stand trial, he's out.

Also, remember he was already put on bail once:

A mental health assessment used as part of the sentencing hearing said he "continued to express the intent to return to cyber-crime as soon as possible. He is highly motivated."

The jury was told that while he was on bail for hacking Nvidia and BT/EE and in police protection at a Travelodge hotel, he continued hacking and carried out his most infamous hack.

Despite having his laptop confiscated, Kurtaj managed to breach Rockstar, the company behind GTA, using an Amazon Firestick, his hotel TV and a mobile phone.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 105 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Are we still acting like this excuse was the actual explanation for why you couldn't use a calculator?

They just said this. It was easier than trying to explain the nuances of education to kids. The actual reason was "because you have to learn to use your brain to do shit, it's kind of important."

Like, this is the equivalent of being upset the gym teacher wouldn't let you use a segway in class. You're missing the point.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 123 points 7 months ago

The planes first received spoofed GPS signals, meaning signals designed to fool planes’ systems into thinking they are flying miles away from their real location. One of the aircraft almost flew into Iranian airspace without permission

Tomorrow Never Dies continues to be bizarrely relevant.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 103 points 9 months ago

Artificial engagement only gets you so far.

I only say something when I have something to say. If I don't, then it becomes a chore.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 119 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm getting here too late for this to be visible, but fuck it.

The difference is Apple doesn't pass any information on to the website. It just tells the website whether or not it passes their integrity check. Your web environment gets the Apple stamp of approval or it doesn't, that's all the sites will know.

Googles shit is going pass actual information about the browser state, add-ons, and the device to the site so they can restrict access based on any criteria they choose. That creates endless more avenues for abuse by giving the websites the ability to judge you for themselves and micromanage how you are allowed to visit their site.

Apple's is the equivalent of a metal detector before walking into a building. It will go off but it doesn't violate your privacy or enable targeted screening by telling anyone what it detected.

Google's is the equivalent of a strip search, where it will drop your clothes and pictures of your junk onto the property managers desk so they can decide if you're worthy to enter. Maybe they don't like your brand of underwear, or a tattoo you have, and refuse to let you in.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 105 points 10 months ago

Lol again with this? Wealthy fucks have been trying this since the 1700s. It never works.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

deweydecibel

joined 1 year ago