I really wanted Coral Island to win the chill game category. That game is legitimately great, the first of the "Stardew clones" era of farming games that is actually good on its own right.
Dave the diver just comes off to me as a massively advertised bleh
Then they'd have a harder time charging $2/month for it.
I think that they are looking for a resume builder, but I have no idea why AI would be involved.
And the character says it so fucking often
Thunderclap requires a spell slot and isn't a bonus action. Part of the problem is that every enemy gets to do their full attack, and then go ahead and try a shove just to see if it works for funsies.
If shoves work to the way that they do in d&d, then an enemy going for a shove and failing would mean that they had done nothing on their turn and that you would be net-positive on the round. That doesn't happen in this game because they get to have their cake and eat it too by getting to make an attack and a shove in the same turn.
It looks like maybe is showing the username as opposed to the display name. The username is "@autotldr@lemmings.world" and then the display name is "AutoTL;DR", so I think you're seeing it correctly you're just seeing a different thing.
Yeah, I've said before that as much as people liked to hate on Chris Metzen, it seems that when he left it was a massive migration of optimistic talents out of the company. Now, that's not to say that he caused people to leave, as opposed to him leaving for the same reason that everyone else did, but I've looked at it as a big turning point in blizzard's history of being generally good-natured.
Same. I used GPM, then when they added YouTube Premium, I used that too. When they killed GPM in favor of YTM, I dropped the entire service.
Literally final fantasy 16 is a Sony exclusive right now, so it's not like anyone can even claim it's a historical thing
That would be a ridiculous position to hold.
I'm pretty sure that you generally can't do that, in the US at least.
A C-level officer is required generally to act in the best interest of the company, but as long as the genuinely think that what they were doing was an attempt to improve the company in some way, you'd be hard-pressed to ever prove that they weren't acting in the best interest. You'd have to find physical proof that they were intentionally sabotaging the company, and (probably) no one who is smart enough to become a CEO is going to do that.