charonn0

That would be a federal crime.

I disagree and here's why.

The 10th amendment does not constrain the state governments, and this is not an ex post facto law.

States are not required to enforce the laws of other states, and generally do not have any legal standing to challenge other states' laws.

It is generally not legal for a state to prosecute someone for actions that took place outside of their jurisdiction.

That covers people who commit a crime in state A and then flee to state B. It's not clear whether it's even possible for a citizen of state B to commit a crime in state A without entering state A.

Whatever else, I'm sure we can all agree that the current performative, pro-forma electoral college meetings are not what was intended by the framers.

There are only so many ways to divide 435 seats while still guaranteeing at least 1 seat per state.

If that were true, we'd expect to see red states with higher minimum wages than blue states, no?

The FBI recommends using an ad blocker for precisely this reason.

I'm going with the UT malfunction because it handily explains Picard's use of "merde".

On the contrary, it's free expression that should not be mislabeled as hate speech.

In TNG's Contagion, turning it off and on again was actually the solution.

Seven only threw herself at him in a dream.