States have always had control over federal elections and candidate qualifications. That's been fundamental to American federalism since the very beginning.
It's not like oath-breaking is the only disqualifier, and states decide those too.
charonn0
joined 2 years ago
Time to violently storm the Supreme Court, then. After all, they approve.
I didn't know it existed. I like it.
"A cuddly juvenile pornomorphic bear."
Drink several glasses of water before going to bed so you wake up to pee.
Can someone provide the opposite of the tl;dr? A too short, didn't understand?
For example, https://theconversation.com/the-french-revolution-executed-royals-and-nobles-yes-but-most-people-killed-were-commoners-200455 which cites this book https://www.amazon.com/Incidence-Terror-During-French-Revolution/dp/0844612111 (unavailable online as far as I can tell.)
I'd also highly recommend Mike Duncan's Revolutions podcast series on the French Revolution.
It's worth pointing out that the guillotine was primarily used to terrorize the poor commoners, not nobles (who had already fled the country by that point.)
I wonder if the sender will do their federal and state sentences concurrently or consecutively.
We all know how devastating a second Trump term would be. It’s also important to understand the damage that Biden is doing by funding a plausible genocide
"That's a nice country you've got there. Be a shame if something happened to it..."
Well, what does the lease actually say? If it says the discounts were temporary marketing gimmicks, then that's what they are. If it doesn't say that, then that's what they are not.
States have always had that power. Whether its age, naturalization, or oath-breaking, it's never been up to the federal government to decide disqualification.